Nerwen Aldarion
Tennessee Girl
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2010
- Messages
- 6,149
- Likes
- 9,350
For the most part I agree that it’s a scam. That doesn’t mean there are not real problems that needs a solution. And the Message has been stolen by the rioters. But again that doesn’t mean we stop trying to affect change.
Yes, there are real problems needing solutions, but where do the problems originate and who continues them. In your point about black women and abortion I certainly get the point, but who besides those black women set themselves up for needing/wanting an abortion? Except in terms of rape (which still remains illegal), pregnancy is basically a choice - sometimes the choice simply being prepared to abstain or take preventive measures. Hopefully we can acknowledge that is personal choice and not systemic incompetence on the part of black women.
To me the biggest issue here is and always has been one element - education, and whether people chose to take advantage of it or choose to fail. I hope we don't believe that some races or ethnicities are unable to learn rather than believe that their social systems don't value education. My cardiologist (for 30+ years) is black; I have literally put my life in his hands. By percentage your faith (as I recall) turns out tons more doctors than the black population, and that same faith has faced real systemic "racism" (for lack of a better term). Life is what we make of it - starting at a time we ourselves are guided by parents and other adults; if those who guide go with the message that you are and have been oppressed and can't get by in this other person's world, how do we expect those children to succeed?
How exactly?Lol you're way out of your depth here
The “slogan” is the name of the radical organization.
Read this
https://blacklivesmatter.com/six-years-strong/
They try to paint George Zimmerman as a white man (white passing person) being supported/celebrated by white supremacists.
The whole organization is based on lies.
That doesn’t mean I ever supported George Zimmerman. It’s just a fact.
I get that for impoverished and uneducated youth. But not for youth on a college campus.
Agreed - the entire situation just reminds me of the line from this speech “infiltration instead of invasion”I am not denying the origin, just stating the recent accelerant. Those hundreds of generals were removed for a reason and who knows what other career bureaucrats who now have ever increasing power. The legacy lives on.
And UT better tread lightly with the discipline for college kids who had/went to a party.I whole-heatedly support the right of students, staff, and players to assemble and march, as long as they are not engaging in unlawful violence or destruction. That's freedom, and it's supported by our Constitution.
That being said, don't tell me the kids can't go to class, hang out at private parties, or fill the football stadium.
Look I dislike Trump. But you should take a moment to look into the allegations of collusion. They aren’t proven by any means. . Senate intel report appendix written by Dems said no overarching proof. Mueller basically proved Russians wanted Trump and did what they could to help. But again no proof of collusion. At the end of the day Russia wanted Trump. Putin loathed Hillary.Once again, especially rich considering you've been getting swindled by a Russian troll for years on end.
Sooooon.
15 years ago nobody would of comprehended this foolishness at such unprecedented speed. Now what person is relevant to accelerating this over half this 15 year period and have the power to implement with increasingly powerful bureaucrats?
You're a solid poster, but just like @Nerwen Aldarion you've inserted yourself into something without understanding the conversation, which has nothing to do with the Mueller report and everything to do with @ajvol01 talking about how younger BLM supporters can't recognize deception, which is especially rich since he's been worshipping at the alter of Qanon for years on end, a movement that preys on people who are easily deceived. I'm of the opinion Q is a Russian troll, hence the comment.Look I dislike Trump. But you should take a moment to look into the allegations of collusion. They aren’t proven by any means. . Senate intel report appendix written by Dems said no overarching proof. Mueller basically proved Russians wanted Trump and did what they could to help. But again no proof of collusion. At the end of the day Russia wanted Trump. Putin loathed Hillary.
These 11 Mueller Report Myths Just Won’t Die
Whoa whoa… easy there, fellow.If you're expecting a meltdown tomorrow, that's not going to happen. And this has nothing to do with the racial composition of the roster. This has to do with the character composition of the roster. Not every player on that roster is a sheep.
And as I just said, the seed has been planted. Even Dollarweed takes time to grow, but once it does you all but have to burn the yard to get rid of it.
I'll be here to eat my crow if I'm wrong.
I'm reminded of the words of Sir Winston Churchil: “You were given the choice between war and dishonour. You chose dishonour, and you will have war.' - To Neville Chamberlain”
Maybe a reach under these circumstances, but for some reason it seems to fit.
I apologize. I wasn’t following the convo. I don’t know if Q is Russian troll. But he is a giant troll.You're a solid poster, but just like @Nerwen Aldarion you've inserted yourself into something without understanding the conversation, which has nothing to do with the Mueller report and everything to do with @ajvol01 talking about how younger BLM supporters can't recognize deception, which is especially rich since he's been worshipping at the alter of Qanon for years on end, a movement that preys on people who are easily deceived. I'm of the opinion Q is a Russian troll, hence the comment.
"KB5252 said:
No excuses, it is what it is. How I feel about the organization personally doesn't matter. Mainly because as long as the police departments are "militarized" every time there is an incident the focus will be on police action instead of in the issues within the AA community where the real issues are.
Do I believe some changes in how police operate and it are trained needs to take place? Yes, because it isn't a black and white issue really.. Do I feel it will have the effect the AA believes it will? No? Because the real issues are within the culture adopted by the community.
I gave you a like because I liked most of your substance but I got to admit how many police officers do you think would go into a potentially hostile situation with only a billy club? The money wouldn't be worth because it already isn't and many do want to go home when the shift is over.
You know, though, it's a problem when a cop shoots someone 7 times in the back at point blank range and doesn't kill him - on a whole lot of levels.
From a deadly serious perspective, I probably look at a lot of this from a lot different viewpoint. We had a very good friend - a retired Navy officer, who was shot and killed inside his house by a cop. There was some local coverage, but absolutely nothing national - he was white. Unlike several of the black victims, he was never even addressed by the police - he was shot through a window when he went downstairs in the middle of the night to see what the disturbance was without ever knowing what the noise he heard was. The point is that there was nothing sensational to the news people - absolutely no reason because it didn't fit their liberal agenda.
Without doubt the police have been militarized to the point that they don't even consider themselves civil enforcement. If we were actually making this an issue of police oversight and reasserting the rightful role of the police, then this would be all about all lives matter - not just those of one group. If "defunding" meant taking away military vehicles, uniforms, tactics, and arrogance, then I think many of us would back that reform. 9/11 put in place a real knee jerk reaction that we are paying for today.
The other issue that no one seems to be addressing is who has control of an agenda. When a cop stops someone, the cop is in control - that's just simple fact like it or not. I don't because by nature I abhor authority, but I accept it exists and sometime I have to respect it. When somebody turns his back and walks away from a cop, he just took control away from the cop. I'm convinced that between militarization and sometimes hiring cops whose heads aren't screwed on tight (they want to play cop for the wrong reason), there is no way that the cop will cede control willingly. To me the person most responsible was the guy who turned his back on the cop and basically said "screw you" - that's not going to end well ... ever.