Just like Peyton didn't play defense when he lost to Florida 3 times, Tebow didn't play defense when the Florida lost 4 games his sophomore season (Despite the Heisman Trophy season performance) because of UF's weak defense. The argument of record as a starter is very weak.[/quote]
Possibly the weakest argument in all of team sports. And I mean across the board, not just in this debate. Wins and championships are great for singles tennis, golf, bowling etc but mean precious little in team sports.
Take the best anybody, ever, at any given position (your choice) and put them on a lousy team and all you've got is a great player with a losing record.
For instance, as much as I love T Martin the idea that "he beat Florida" is so far beyond reality it's painful. The whole freaking offense managed only 235 yards against FL in '98, (including an OT mind you) with 57 of that coming on Bryson's run. So minus that run TN had a whopping 178yds of total offense. FL QB's Jesse Palmer and Dough Johnson EACH had more passing yards than that. Anybody remember how many passing yards we had vs FL in 98? Try 64. But noooo, "Tee Martin beat Florida".
How about a defense, led my Al Wilson with 9 solo tackles, 3 assists, a pass break up and 3...yes 3 forced fumbles? (out of 6 FL turnovers on the night) Nah, it was Tee.
Team records are about team accomplishments. Yes a great player, especially at QB or RB can make a big difference, but to simply give them credit for winning anything, in a seeming vacuum that doesn't include the rest of the players, is just silly.