Ohio Vol
Inquisitor of Offense
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2006
- Messages
- 3,057
- Likes
- 128
It depends on how you believe an offense should be run and what your other personnel look like. If you've got receivers who can make plays on a consistent basis and they just need someone who can get the ball there, Manning's your man.
If you're like me and believe that offense is built around prodding to find that matchup that is unfavorable to the defense, you take Tebow. He doesn't have to have Manning's accuracy and/or arm strength. He needs to just do enough in the running game to create a one-on-one matchup on the outside or get linebackers on receivers; the receiver is better able to adjust mid-flight and come down with the ball in that situation than against a zone.
But if we're talking best college QB...that's a tough call. I loved Tommie Frazier. I believe that Michael Vick could have done so much more if he had a more creative offensive mind.
If you're like me and believe that offense is built around prodding to find that matchup that is unfavorable to the defense, you take Tebow. He doesn't have to have Manning's accuracy and/or arm strength. He needs to just do enough in the running game to create a one-on-one matchup on the outside or get linebackers on receivers; the receiver is better able to adjust mid-flight and come down with the ball in that situation than against a zone.
But if we're talking best college QB...that's a tough call. I loved Tommie Frazier. I believe that Michael Vick could have done so much more if he had a more creative offensive mind.
