Talent only goes so far. You have to be able to coach
Talent is one thing but you still have to coach them up IMO.
Look at Boise. They had like 6 guys drafted, 2 first rounders if I'm not mistaken. Boise is a team that has nowhere near the resources or ability to attract big time recruits into their program like most SEC schools. Just my two cents.
It's hard to believe we've virtually had no senior class for the last three years, including this upcoming season. I dare you to find any school anywhere that could say the same barring any major NCAA penalties and/or probation. I still don't know if Dooley is the guy. I think he will get us somewhere between 8 to 10 wins on average, but whether or not he's the guy to take us to SEC titles and national titles, I just don't know. He's definitely had a short deck his first two years, as well as incredibly bad luck; however, he's also made a lot of bonehead decisions, in my opinion, as well. To be fair, even coaches like Saban have made their share of bonehead decisions. (See first Alabama/LSU matchup this past season.) You almost have to wonder, though, if Dooley was so ill-fated his first two years here, that it can't help but keep him from ever really exploding things here. An 8 to 10 win season this coming year would help, but what will help the most is the ability to replicate that again the year after. If he retreats in the win dept. again after next season, then I think he'll never take off here. With that being said, I think Dooley is the biggest proponent of Bray, Hunter, Rodgers, and possibly Patterson staying for their senior seasons. While I think we will be successful this coming year, Dooley simply can't afford to crap out again in 2013-14.
It's hard to believe we've virtually had no senior class for the last three years, including this upcoming season. I dare you to find any school anywhere that could say the same barring any major NCAA penalties and/or probation. I still don't know if Dooley is the guy. I think he will get us somewhere between 8 to 10 wins on average, but whether or not he's the guy to take us to SEC titles and national titles, I just don't know. He's definitely had a short deck his first two years, as well as incredibly bad luck; however, he's also made a lot of bonehead decisions, in my opinion, as well. To be fair, even coaches like Saban have made their share of bonehead decisions. (See first Alabama/LSU matchup this past season.) You almost have to wonder, though, if Dooley was so ill-fated his first two years here, that it can't help but keep him from ever really exploding things here. An 8 to 10 win season this coming year would help, but what will help the most is the ability to replicate that again the year after. If he retreats in the win dept. again after next season, then I think he'll never take off here. With that being said, I think Dooley is the biggest proponent of Bray, Hunter, Rodgers, and possibly Patterson staying for their senior seasons. While I think we will be successful this coming year, Dooley simply can't afford to crap out again in 2013-14.
Talent is one thing but you still have to coach them up IMO.
Look at Boise. They had like 6 guys drafted, 2 first rounders if I'm not mistaken. Boise is a team that has nowhere near the resources or ability to attract big time recruits into their program like most SEC schools. Just my two cents.
I think 8 wins or even 7 wins with a big win over UGA, USC, UF or even UA would help UT. CDD has recruited the foundation for the team, just needs a few big play makers on each side of the ball. Especially defense. I think if the season finishes well for UT they will land the players UT needs to start competing for the east again.
7 wins this coming season, barring another cataclysm of injuries at key positions, and Dooley is done. This team should win 8 at worse. Heck, they probably would have won at least 7 last year had it not been for the injuries: USC, Kentucky, and possibly one of Georgia or Florida. My biggest concern is not with Dooley's recruiting after next season if the wins come in. My biggest concern is that a lot of our key players will defect to the NFL, thus leaving a void for a year or so. If Dooley then takes a step backward in the win dept. in 2013-14, I don't think it will matter what kind of recruiting class he brings in. Another 5 to 6 (maybe even 7) win season in 2013-14 will not cut it, even if he wins 8 to 10 next year. I have no doubt in my mind that Dooley would eventually reel in 8 to 10 wins a year here regularly, given time, but with the first two years he's had, he has a very tight rope for the next couple years at least. One bad season, even if it's preceded by a good season, could spell the end for him. And then we'd just be starting all over. I sincerely hope Dooley succeeds.
I think another big factor is that everyone else around us has gotten better, way better. Look at Bama, SC, Georgia, FL, LSU, and Auburn. Eight years ago, LSU, Auburn, GA, SC, and Bama were almost guaranteed wins every year for us.
This.....and the reason they're all better is because they all upgraded in the coaching dept significantly.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
It will come down to what he can produce on the field and if he can maintain discipline off the field. Shula for the most part did well on the field but could not control the players off the field. But he did leave Saban with more talent than CDD came into. With the trouble UT has endured through all the coaching changes I doubt the new AD will look to run CDD out anytime soon. No matter how much the fans may want it. UT needs stability if anything. CDD may never win the East or may, who knows, but he will build back up the roster with depth and make UT one of the better teams in the east before long. After that maybe replace him, but getting rid of him now would only be a step back. A step UT can not afford to take.
The funny part about Shula is most UA fans are happy he missed out out on his biggest recruit that he almost got. If Shula could of pulled in Tebow away from UF in the end UA would have never hired Saban and UA would probably be a middle of the pack team in the SEC right now. So sometimes it actually works out missing on the big fish.
Talent is one thing but you still have to coach them up IMO.
Look at Boise. They had like 6 guys drafted, 2 first rounders if I'm not mistaken. Boise is a team that has nowhere near the resources or ability to attract big time recruits into their program like most SEC schools. Just my two cents.
Boise doesnt play in the SEC
But they did beat UGA last year...
Boise is a good team, but truth of the matter...yea they beat Georgia but they can't hack a schedule where you consistently play Georgia, Florida, bama, USCjr, etc every year and be consistent winners. so the argument that they win with less talent is invalid bc they have a pretty easy schedule with the exception of 2 games a year.
Agree - solid post. I may be pessemistic, but I've always maintained that Dools deserves this year to prove himself.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I hear u, but with all the resoures we have should we ever lose to kensucky?I think I see sarcasm here but the people that actually uses this argument makes me sick. That guy had 120 something yards total offense and Kensuckys entire offense had just under or over 200. We lost because our offense couldnt do jacks**t that day.