Sunseri vs Wilcox

#52
#52
We gave up huge plays under Wilcox too. Even Buffalo had a 50+ yd run on us.
 
#54
#54
You really dont want to start using stats to defend Sal vs Wilcox unless you want to talk turnovers. We are creating more TO's.
 
#55
#55
VolMaster14 said:
Who said it takes five years? Put your head in a brown paper bag or take a xanex!
Click to expand...
So how many years does it take genius? I was being sarcastic.
If the answer is over 1 than its stupid. Whether you like it or not, Dooley is gone if this season goes down the tubes. I realize you think you're a better fan and everything but reality is reality brother.
 
#56
#56
VolMaster14 said:
Even though there are growing pains, I love that he is installing the 3-4 defense. Will be much better in the long run imo. He has a championship pedigree with bammer and was responsible for the stud LBs they had and just his overall fire and demeanor. He's already shown when these kids don't perform they way he demands, he is in their face.
Click to expand...

You might be right, time will tell. Counterpoints are

1 CSS was last a DC in 1999, not in D1 nor in the SEC and may like CDD be in over his head

2 The changeover is complex, and difficult for the players to learn. When they make inevitable mistakes CSS rips them a new one. As a result they play tentatively, making them slow to react and giving up the big plays.

Not a knock on the system, more a question on whether CSS is da man. Results will give the verdict. I hope he gets it worked out.
 
#57
#57
spudvol said:
I covered that UGA myth here.

UGA 2009 D (Pre-Grantham)
Rush Defense 36th 126y/g
Pass Defense 52nd 213y/g
Total Defense 38th 339 y/g
Scoring Defense 64th 26 p/g

UGA 2010 D (Grantham 1st year)
Rush Defense 56th 147y/g
Pass Defense 17th 181y/g
Total Defense 23rd 328y/g
Scoring Defense 36th 22 p/g
Click to expand...

Notice how they improved in every category except for rushing D.

I hate to tell ya but, that aint happening here,
 
#58
#58
VolMaster14 said:
Check my post in this thread sport, they're on topic.
Click to expand...

Well your response to my post wasn't, which typically happens when you don't know ****. Than you say something about how you're a better fan and something about my handle. Classic defense mechanisms. Keep it up you amazing Vol fan!!
 
#59
#59
KingtUT said:
You really dont want to start using stats to defend Sal vs Wilcox unless you want to talk turnovers. We are creating more TO's.
Click to expand...

See if you can tell what we are creating more of in this example-

2011 vs UF, UGA 703yds 53pts
2112 vs UF, UGA 1115yds 88pts
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#60
#60
PanicVol said:
Well your response to my post wasn't, which typically happens when you don't know ****. Than you say something about how you're a better fan and something about my handle. Classic defense mechanisms. Keep it up you amazing Vol fan!!
Click to expand...

:ermm: :unsure:
 
#62
#62
PanicVol said:
So how many years does it take genius? I was being sarcastic.
If the answer is over 1 than its stupid. Whether you like it or not, Dooley is gone if this season goes down the tubes. I realize you think you're a better fan and everything but reality is reality brother.
Click to expand...


LMAO @ it should only take 1 year to totally rebuild a football program.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

That's 1 of the funniest and dumbest things I've ever seen, LOL.

No wonder he lives in a constant panic, LOL.

VFL...GBO!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#63
#63
Can't expect the 3-4 defense to instantly work for a team. That's why I believe Dooley will get another season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#64
#64
Titan&Volfan4life said:
LMAO @ it should only take 1 year to totally rebuild a football program.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

That's 1 of the funniest and dumbest things I've ever seen, LOL.

No wonder he lives in a constant panic, LOL.

VFL...GBO!!!
Click to expand...

Why don't you read before you respond smart guy. I was talking about how long it takes to implement a 3-4, not totally rebuild a program. You're trying way too hard.
 
#65
#65
gunner said:
Did you watch last season? Most of the players are back from a defense that finished sixth in the SEC and 30th nationally. These are the same players we have now.

Sunseri is a failure. Now we know why he he has been an assistant for his most of his career.
Click to expand...

Sal has installed a 100% diff defensive scheme than Coach WILCOX* ran...and it is a defense that will take time to adjust to.

Your posts thus far in this thread, (and most likely every other thread you have posted in-havent read them all, and don't want to either), have been insanely ignorant. Hell, you can't even spell "WILCOX" correctly!!! How do you expect anyone to take your ignorant opinion seriously?

At least have a general idea what you are talking about before posting!!!

GTFO...

Go VOLS!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#66
#66
PanicVol said:
Do you not know what a defense mechanism is? Google it and educate yourself.
Click to expand...

Actually I do, what I don't know is why you're so bent outta shape. I never said I was a better vol fan than anyone and I was complimenting your handle cause it suits you well. And you say reality is reality, well judging a coach five games into the season is far from reality, brother (Hulk Hogan voice)!

**edit** sorry forgot to add brother at the end
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#67
#67
VolMaster14 said:
Actually I do, what I don't know is why you're so bent outta shape. I never said I was a better vol fan than anyone and I was complimenting your handle cause it suits you well. And you say reality is reality, well judging a coach five games into the season is far from reality!
Click to expand...
Ok whatever, my point is that in a season where your job is on the line, maybe bringing in a d coordinator whose system takes a while to implement isn't the best idea.

Its just a handle bro, but at least you're not judgmental at all.
 
#68
#68
PanicVol said:
Ok whatever, my point is that in a season where your job is on the line, maybe bringing in a d coordinator whose system takes a while to implement isn't the best idea.

Its just a handle bro, but at least you're not judgmental at all.
Click to expand...

Maybe Dooley knows he has more time..
 
#70
#70
Sorry panic but I've never believed that CDDs job is on the line this season.

His contract is solid, buyout is big, UT doesn't have the money but most importantly is that AD Hart likes CDD and loves his rebuilding plan and he sees improvements being made so unless we only win 5 or 6 games I think CDD will be here next season.

VFL...GBO!!!
 
#72
#72
Titan&Volfan4life said:
Sorry panic but I've never believed that CDDs job is on the line this season.

His contract is solid, buyout is big, UT doesn't have the money but most importantly is that AD Hart likes CDD and loves his rebuilding plan and he sees improvements being made so unless we only win 5 or 6 games I think CDD will be here next season.

VFL...GBO!!!
Click to expand...

If we only win 5 or 6 games, i don't I'll make it through the offseason without cutting myself.
 
#73
#73
PanicVol said:
If we only win 5 or 6 games, i don't I'll make it through the offseason without cutting myself.
Click to expand...

sarcasm_detector.jpg
 
#74
#74
KingtUT said:
SAL has a hell of a lot more to work with than Wilcox ever dreamed of.
Click to expand...
Aw hell, one post down and I see you were already doin' it! I feel obligated now. CSS came here to head up the extremely painful, but very necessary task of bringing us into the modern age of defense. It is ALWAYS painstaking and, even with a fully stocked and locked personel grouping, is wrought with game risking gashes, issues with communication and an appearance of collapse in scheme (because that is exactly what you see). First, as the team gains experience these become lessened and you see flashes of what it will eventually be (reference the teeth rattling hits, three consequtive stops at a critical time against an extremely polished offense last night and the picks and turnovers). This will get better, but still have some maddening moments all season long. Then Sal recruits players that are prototypical 3-4 players. They will then be Freshmen, but with the athletes that we have, although, sometimes not exactly what you would want in certain spots or covering a position that is not their real/natural role or best ultimate spot to utilize them as the pups are growing. The pups grow and a new litter is brought in, again, SPECIFICALLY recruited to play in a 3-4 (please, at this moment, reference Bammer). Is everyone getting their arms around this? It, as I said, is painstaking and PAINFUL, but it is the proper call and will pay dividends. Note here: This was a great executive decision by Dooley that is difficult to see at this juncture, but will eventually become obvious. Frankly, it even helps with recruiting said player types that end up being the player types that play on Sundays. Dooley made the decision knowing full well that it was not in the best interest of a coach that inherited crap and, thus, is being ganked by psuedo-fans that THINK that they understand the game, but are not dialed into the minutia of the evolving game and are satified to "putt of the spanking until Daddy gets home vs. evolving to the proven future of defense AHEAD of the curve. The move was made because it is the best decision for the program and Dooley exhibited large cajones by doing this now, at this point, when a change was going to be made anyway due to the vacating of a coordinator that still plays stoneage scheme and with an eye towards the future. Self preservation was eliminated as a factor for the longterm good of the team. That, my friends, is admirable and deserves some reciprocation from all knowledgable fans. Team before self. Surely that is something that we can endure with an eye on the future as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#75
#75
volbreaker said:
Aw hell, one post down and I see you were already doin' it! I feel obligated now. CSS came here to head up the extremely painful, but very necessary task of bringing us into the modern age of defense. It is ALWAYS painstaking and, even with a fully stocked and locked personel grouping, is wrought with game risking gashes, issues with communication and an appearance of collapse in scheme (because that is exactly what you see). First, as the team gains experience these become lessened and you see flashes of what it will eventually be (reference the teeth rattling hits, three consequtive stops at a critical time against an extremely polished offense last night and the picks and turnovers). This will get better, but still have some maddening moments all season long. Then Sal recruits players that are prototypical 3-4 players. They will then be Freshmen, but with the athletes that we have, although, sometimes not exactly what you would want in certain spots or covering a position that is not their real/natural role or best ultimate spot to utilize them as the pups are growing. The pups grow and a new litter is brought in, again, SPECIFICALLY recruited to play in a 3-4 (please, at this moment, reference Bammer). Is everyone getting their arms around this? It, as I said, is painstaking and PAINFUL, but it is the proper call and will pay dividends. Note here: This was a great executive decision by Dooley that is difficult to see at this juncture, but will eventually become obvious. Frankly, it even helps with recruiting said player types that end up being the player types that play on Sundays. Dooley made the decision knowing full well that it was not in the best interest of a coach that inherited crap and, thus, is being ganked by psuedo-fans that THINK that they understand the game, but are not dialed into the minutia of the evolving game and are satified to "putt of the spanking until Daddy gets home vs. evolving to the proven future of defense AHEAD of the curve. The move was made because it is the best decision for the program and Dooley exhibited large cajones by doing this now, at this point, when a change was going to be made anyway due to the vacating of a coordinator that still plays stoneage scheme and with an eye towards the future. Self preservation was eliminated as a factor for the longterm good of the team. That, my friends, is admirable and deserves some reciprocation from all knowledgable fans. Team before self. Surely that is something that we can endure with an eye on the future as well.
Click to expand...
Did you watch the Stanford vs Washington game?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top