omghulkhands
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2010
- Messages
- 13,010
- Likes
- 17,692
I would question any metric that doesn’t rank Alabama as having the toughest schedule in the nation. Ours has been very tough as well, although I’d say probably in the 5-10 range.
Lmao....Bama played only played Gonzaga and Houston in notable non conference games. While we played Villanova, UNC, Texas Tech, and Arizona. Our schedule has definitely been tougher.I would question any metric that doesn’t rank Alabama as having the toughest schedule in the nation. Ours has been very tough as well, although I’d say probably in the 5-10 range.
You need to take off the orange tinted glasses for this one. Outside of those 4 games (and you could say Colorado), we played nothing but cupcakes in OOC play. Miami, Iona, Davidson, Memphis, Drake, South Dakota State, Louisiana Tech are all top 100 KenPom teams and they played the toughest of those on neutral or away courts. Oakland is 104. Alabama has, by a wide margin, the toughest schedule in the country. They’ve basically had zero off nights all season.Lmao....Bama played only played Gonzaga and Houston in notable non conference games. While we played Villanova, UNC, Texas Tech, and Arizona. Our schedule has definitely been tougher.
Tennessee has played 8 Top 50 opponents, 2 home and 6 road/neutral.I would question any metric that doesn’t rank Alabama as having the toughest schedule in the nation. Ours has been very tough as well, although I’d say probably in the 5-10 range.
Yea I edited that into my post, if you put a lot of stock in playing teams 60-100 then I could see where you’d think Bama…I personally don’t find beating a 90th ranked team all that impressive from a SOS standpoint, what Alabama did is what Pearl used to be great at here, scheduling MM’s that were expected to be good but that you should beat.Yes, the top half of our schedules have both been very difficult. I’m not denying this. But as I stated above, move this down to top 75 or top 100. It’s not close.
It’s not that I put a lot of stock into it, but South Dakota state, Drake, and Miami are objectively better wins than Tennessee tech, Presbyterian, and UT Martin. This is the reason Bama has several worse losses than us but is generally on the same seed line as us in everyone’s bracketology. I’m not arguing that our top 4-5 games have not been as tough as anyones, they certainly have.Yea I edited that into my post, if you put a lot of stock in playing teams 60-100 then I could see where you’d think Bama…I personally don’t find beating a 90th ranked team all that impressive from a SOS standpoint, what Alabama did is what Pearl used to be great at here, scheduling MM’s that were expected to be good but that you should beat.
I guess that’s where the argument comes in, how much difference is there between 80 vs. 120, yes the 80 is stronger but how much? How does that weigh against 8 Top 50 vs. 7 Top 50? And then diving into that of those Top 50 how much credit for Tennessee playing 6/8 on the road and Bama only 3/7 on the road?It’s not that I put a lot of stock into it, but South Dakota state, Drake, and Miami are objectively better wins than Tennessee tech, Presbyterian, and UT Martin. This is the reason Bama has several worse losses than us but is generally on the same seed line as us in everyone’s bracketology. I’m not arguing that our top 4-5 games have not been as tough as anyones, they certainly have.
From a win probability standpoint, say you have 10 game schedule. One schedule has 5 of the best teams in the country and the team is given a 10% chance to win those games and they schedule 5 of the worst and have a 90% chance to win. The cumulative expected win total is 5 games. The other schedule has 10 middle of the road opponents and is given a 50% chance to win each game. Expected win total is 5 games. Who has the harder schedule?I guess that’s where the argument comes in, how much difference is there between 80 vs. 120, yes the 80 is stronger but how much? How does that weigh against 8 Top 50 vs. 7 Top 50? And then diving into that of those Top 50 how much credit for Tennessee playing 6/8 on the road and Bama only 3/7 on the road?
I think an argument can be made either way and it’s going to depend on the formula and how much weight is placed on different things, but I definitely think they’re comparable. I think it’s fair to say Tennessee’s is tougher at the top but Alabama’s is more balanced.
Yes.From a win probability standpoint, say you have 10 game schedule. One schedule has 5 of the best teams in the country and the team is given a 10% chance to win those games and they schedule 5 of the worst and have a 90% chance to win. The cumulative expected win total is 5 games. The other schedule has 10 middle of the road opponents and is given a 50% chance to win each game. Expected win total is 5 games. Who has the harder schedule?
From a win probability standpoint, say you have 10 game schedule. One schedule has 5 of the best teams in the country and the team is given a 10% chance to win those games and they schedule 5 of the worst and have a 90% chance to win. The cumulative expected win total is 5 games. The other schedule has 10 middle of the road opponents and is given a 50% chance to win each game. Expected win total is 5 games. Who has the harder schedule?
Not exactly but the general rational behind SOS ratings is what the cumulative win probability would be for an average team against that schedule. Bama played a lot of games where the win probabilities were comfortably to their favor but very few that were 99% like we had against UT Martin, USC Upstate, etc. It makes a difference in the cumulative ratings.I understand the point you’re trying to make, but that example is not indicative of the Vols/bama schedule differences.
Imo the team with the 5 best teams, but jmo.From a win probability standpoint, say you have 10 game schedule. One schedule has 5 of the best teams in the country and the team is given a 10% chance to win those games and they schedule 5 of the worst and have a 90% chance to win. The cumulative expected win total is 5 games. The other schedule has 10 middle of the road opponents and is given a 50% chance to win each game. Expected win total is 5 games. Who has the harder schedule?
Not exactly but the general rational behind SOS ratings is what the cumulative win probability would be for an average team against that schedule. Bama played a lot of games where the win probabilities were comfortably to their favor but very few that were 99% like we had against UT Martin, USC Upstate, etc. It makes a difference in the cumulative ratings.
top 75? top 100? At that point, while those aren't gimme games, they are games a good team is expected to win. I'm sure the sos rankings place more emphasis on higher ranked teams, which they should.Yes, the top half of our schedules have both been very difficult. I’m not denying this. But as I stated above, move this down to top 75 or top 100. It’s not close.
Not to keep this going all night, but the source that ranks these teams has Alabama as, far and away, the highest SOS in the nation and Tennessee with the eighth. I didn’t mean to cause an all day thing with my statements, the whole point was that Alabama has had zero “gimme” wins on their schedule and that’s something that most analytics rankings are going to heavily favor in SOS.top 75? top 100? At that point, while those aren't gimme games, they are games a good team is expected to win. I'm sure the sos rankings place more emphasis on higher ranked teams, which they should.