Stone Temple Pilots -vs- Red Hot Chili Peppers

[MadcapLaughs]

RHCP pre-Frusciante

Nothing against him, he's an excellent guitarist, I just liked their style a lot more before he joined.

which per Frusciante era? Wasn't he in the band, then on heroin for a couple years, then back in the band?

 

[milohimself]

The original one. Basically, their first three albums are my favorites.

 

[bamacheats]

It's a landslide in my book...

Mine too.

 

[Pulscifer]

STP easily for me. 90's Scott Weiland was the best. I'm not that big of a RHCP fan.

 

[OLDEMOSSYBACK]

STP Hate the Chili Peckers.

 

[Cdywolfe]

15 years ago I would've said STP. As I get older the Chilli Peppers have grown on me though. So I'll say RHCP, but its close.

 

[volinbham]

Nod to STP. Definitely like early peppers better than late but if find STP more consistently listenable.

I'll throw this in for the peppers fans

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gTzILT2R6A[/youtube]

 

[milohimself]

That's the RHCP I know and love.

 

[ego]

Gotta go with STP. Never bought into all the RHCP hype, but Under The Bridge is a great f'ng song.

 

[Thrasher865]

I don't even like stone temple ****** ****ing pilots. You don't even know me!

 

[SpecialKVolfan]

I like STP, but the Chili's are my band.

 

[checkerboards09]

Chili Peppers and it's not even close.

 

[OrangeBalls]

I'll go with STP, but the Chili Peppers are a great live band. Saw STP last year and their show was only an hour and a half. They used to play 2-2.25 easily. I guess Weiland can't hack it anymore. Chili Peppers play a good 2 hr show every night. Weiland is one of the best front men in rock when he's on.

This is one of their better shows at Rolling Rock in 2001.
LMAO at the beginning, "Welcome, we're Judas Priest". Heh.

vasoline live at rolling rock - YouTube