State of the Union Address

#301
#301
CNN's flash poll with an explanation that more Democrats tended to watch a Democratic President . . . followed by a 77% approval. That's code for "this is not a representative sample and our poll is crap".
 
Last edited:
#302
#302
So the CNN poll results are skewed towards Democrats but we'll show them to you anyway? What's the point other than holographic (thanks Bam) images?
 
#303
#303
volinbham said:
So the CNN poll results are skewed towards Democrats but we'll show them to you anyway? What's the point other than holographic (thanks Bam) images?
Click to expand...

There really is no point.

That was evident when will.i.am was beamed into the studio.
 
#309
#309
All this analysis is worthless - yet I keep watching. I guess I'm the problem.

The Fleischer vs the other dude exchange was pure partisan cheerleading rather than any insight.

Where are the at least pseudo-detached analysts?
 
#310
#310
volinbham said:
All this analysis is worthless - yet I keep watching. I guess I'm the problem.
Click to expand...

The holograms do the trick for me.

They're one of the few networks that do not run RNC or DNC talking points. At least not in unison.
 
#312
#312
bam15 said:
The holograms do the trick for me.

They're one of the few networks that do not run RNC or DNC talking points. At least not in unison.
Click to expand...

But opposing talking points in unison does not constitute analysis.

Gergin and Crowley are close to true analysis - leave the other clowns out.
 
#314
#314
Can anyone explain why Iwo Jima was even mentioned? Photo was out of focus; we were not against the odds; butchered the pronunciation.

Total disaster.
 
#315
#315
bam15 said:
Can anyone explain why Iwo Jima was even mentioned? Photo was out of focus; we were not against the odds; butchered the pronunciation.

Total disaster.
Click to expand...

Dumb but no dumber than any than typical SOTU references to specific people that are outliers.
 
#319
#319
Gergen is throwing out a straw man - you can't pay for educating our kids?

Just when I thought he was a semi-neutral, legit analyst.
 
#322
#322
I will say that Obama finally stopped blaming Bush tonight and instead blamed everyone that came before him. That's progress I guess.
 
#325
#325
bam15 said:
Agreed.

I was thrilled that he showed some passion. He has tendency to be extremely dry.
Click to expand...

He's fallen into the "entertainment" trap. From what I saw I thought he was a legit and an unbiased (though still biased) as you can be commentator. Then he went all "cable news opinion commentator" on Fleischer. We are all smart enough to figure out where Fleischer is coming from.

I'd like to see straight up analysis even if dull. Those days are over apparently.

I think AB Stoddard on Fox is pretty straight up but she probably bends to the Fox spiel being between two righties though.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top