Pocket Passer
Message Board Nomad
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 162
- Likes
- 0
Ok, let's get it on.....
You think we need to run the spread huh? Okay, well first lets see what the best minds in football are doing. Four of the best teams in the NFL have very good the great pocket passers. No spread offense there. What about the teams with the QB's who might do it, Tennessee and Atlanta. Well, don't think we'll ever find out what Vick was gonna do, but he wasn't doing well. BUT, he sure wasn't running an option either, why? How about the Titans. VY had more rushing yards that the Heisman winner in their National Championship game. Where's the Titans spread offense. They have the players to run it. Hmmmm......
Why have there been so many upsets this year in college football. How are teams with lesser talent beating teams with much better players. It's quite simple, it's currently an equalizer, and it's not unstoppable. The team with the best talent for running the spread this year lost 3 games inside their conference. What did the Bruce Pearl do with less talent two years ago to the likes of Texas and Florida. Ran like crazy for 20 games, and then teams caught on and started shutting us down. The same thing is going to happen to the spread.
The spread creates wider lanes and open space for play makers like Tim Tebow and Percy Harvin to make plays. First, Tebow's a freak, not the norm. What the Gators did with Tebow as a run threat is not much different than what Arkansas did when MacFadden lined up at QB. Tennessee didn't seem to have much trouble stopping Arkansas's version of Tebow did they? Florida's spread believe it or not is a run first option. They just so happen to have a full back at QB who can also throw. Other than Florida, for now, the spread is an equalizer for the weaker teams. It doesn't do much more than they way we ran the no huddle this year. It's made to create mismatches, just like what UT was trying to do all year. One difference, our offense did not have the better athletes. If Ainge had just on guy who could get deep and could go after a ball. That 6'4" to 6'6" 205 to 220 lbs guy that can get over the DB's in the SEC, we have a totally different season. I doubt we lose to Cal. We may still lose to Florida, but we're in the game longer for sure with Alabama and they don't see the ball as much.
The spread is a legitimate offense that creates mismatches, but if your athletes on D, I'll say Eric Berry for starters, can match up and commit to their position, the spread will not be so great looking. Don't get me wrong, I thinks it's great to bring in Gerald Jones in the backfield. But I don't think it needs to be the basis of our offense. We run a pro style offense for a reason, if the pros don't run the spread, why should we. It's good to throw in the mix, but don't bank our whole season on it. The SEC has the speed and hitting power to control the spread, the D coordinators just need to see it, and they'll catch on.
You think we need to run the spread huh? Okay, well first lets see what the best minds in football are doing. Four of the best teams in the NFL have very good the great pocket passers. No spread offense there. What about the teams with the QB's who might do it, Tennessee and Atlanta. Well, don't think we'll ever find out what Vick was gonna do, but he wasn't doing well. BUT, he sure wasn't running an option either, why? How about the Titans. VY had more rushing yards that the Heisman winner in their National Championship game. Where's the Titans spread offense. They have the players to run it. Hmmmm......
Why have there been so many upsets this year in college football. How are teams with lesser talent beating teams with much better players. It's quite simple, it's currently an equalizer, and it's not unstoppable. The team with the best talent for running the spread this year lost 3 games inside their conference. What did the Bruce Pearl do with less talent two years ago to the likes of Texas and Florida. Ran like crazy for 20 games, and then teams caught on and started shutting us down. The same thing is going to happen to the spread.
The spread creates wider lanes and open space for play makers like Tim Tebow and Percy Harvin to make plays. First, Tebow's a freak, not the norm. What the Gators did with Tebow as a run threat is not much different than what Arkansas did when MacFadden lined up at QB. Tennessee didn't seem to have much trouble stopping Arkansas's version of Tebow did they? Florida's spread believe it or not is a run first option. They just so happen to have a full back at QB who can also throw. Other than Florida, for now, the spread is an equalizer for the weaker teams. It doesn't do much more than they way we ran the no huddle this year. It's made to create mismatches, just like what UT was trying to do all year. One difference, our offense did not have the better athletes. If Ainge had just on guy who could get deep and could go after a ball. That 6'4" to 6'6" 205 to 220 lbs guy that can get over the DB's in the SEC, we have a totally different season. I doubt we lose to Cal. We may still lose to Florida, but we're in the game longer for sure with Alabama and they don't see the ball as much.
The spread is a legitimate offense that creates mismatches, but if your athletes on D, I'll say Eric Berry for starters, can match up and commit to their position, the spread will not be so great looking. Don't get me wrong, I thinks it's great to bring in Gerald Jones in the backfield. But I don't think it needs to be the basis of our offense. We run a pro style offense for a reason, if the pros don't run the spread, why should we. It's good to throw in the mix, but don't bank our whole season on it. The SEC has the speed and hitting power to control the spread, the D coordinators just need to see it, and they'll catch on.