South Carolina Fans Thoughts

#51
#51
So let me see if I get this straight, USClite is at the highest point in their football history, and UT is down, and during this period, they are on this site cackling about being 2-2 against UT. A point where our coach was fired for losing to teams like USClite, but in this down period still managed to still win the east one year out of those four years they are so proud about, interesting.
 
#54
#54
Well Lookout You Cockfans,you are gonna be 6-3 because Rocky and his Big D are gonna be at Neyland Sat Nght!!! GO VOLS GO!!!
 
#55
#55
Game comparisons even with common opponents often do not predict outcomes however since UT and USC played Bama in consecutive weeks... it could be a little instructive on the relative strength of the two teams as we enter Saturday:

Bama's O vs... UT = 256 yds, USCe = 356 Advantage UT

Bama's passing O vs... UT = 120 yds/4.1 yds per att, USC = 92 yds/4.6 yds per att even/slight adv USC (However Bama gave up on trying to run over UT like they did USC)
Bama's rushing O vs... UT = 136 yds/4.5 ypc, USC = 264 yds/6.9 ypc Clear UT advantage

Passing vs Bama.... UT = 265 yds/7.2 yds per attempt, USC = 214/4.7 yds per att Advantage UT

QB rating... Crompton = 124, Garcia = 78

Rushing vs Bama.... UT = 76 yds/2.2 ypc, USC = 64 yds/2.4 ypc Push... and anemic for both

Drives that moved inside Bama's 30... UT = 6, USC = 4 Adv UT

Drives of more than 40 yards... UT = 4, USC = 2 Adv UT

Drives of 40 or more allowed... UT = 3, USC = 3 Push

Punt return yds allowed.... UT = 2 for 33 yds, USC = 5 for 75 yds Adv UT

Kick return yds allowed.... UT = 1 for 30, USC = 2 for 45 yds Adv USC

Punt return avg/yds... UT = 23/23, USC = 7/7 Adv UT

Kick return avg/yds... UT = 142/28.4, USC = 111/22.2 Adv UT

Turnover's for/against... UT = 1/1, USC = 4/2 Adv USC (But that is instructive in itself... TO's helped keep USC in it... Offense and Defense kept UT in it)

At no time was USC in a "should have won" situation. UT was there at least 3 times if you don't count the drive ended by a penalty. USC was able to hand on with Bama... UT OUTPLAYED AND OUTCOACHED Bama in every aspect except FG's. Even the other aspects of the kicking game were well played by UT.
 
Last edited:
#56
#56
People...You have no idea what I have to deal with. I am a die-hard UT fan that now lives in Charleston, SC. When living in Knoxville growing I never had any opinion about USCjr. They were just another SEC school we usually beat up on. Since I moved down here and have to live with their fans, they may have moved into my most hated team. Every year they think they are National Title caliber team and finish right around .500. I wish for nothing else than to beat them down.

Any comparison they have about their defense vs. ours is rediculous. They have played nobody so far and are getting to the meat of their SEC schedule. If Tennessee can beat them, I truly feel they will lose their last 5 games.

There are 2 reasons why I will be rooting harder for this game than any other game this year.

1. Because I will be in Knoxville for it.
2. So I can rub it in to all the Gamecock fans I have to live around and work with.

I HATE THE GAMECOCKS.
 
#58
#58
sjt18 said:
Game comparisons even with common opponents often do not predict outcomes however since UT and USC played Bama in consecutive weeks... it could be a little instructive on the relative strength of the two teams as we enter Saturday:

Bama's O vs... UT = 256 yds, USCe = 356 Advantage UT

Bama's passing O vs... UT = 120 yds/4.1 yds per att, USC = 92 yds/4.6 yds per att even/slight adv USC (However Bama gave up on trying to run over UT like they did USC)
Bama's rushing O vs... UT = 136 yds/4.5 ypc, USC = 264 yds/6.9 ypc Clear UT advantage

Passing vs Bama.... UT = 265 yds/7.2 yds per attempt, USC = 214/4.7 yds per att Advantage UT

QB rating... Crompton = 124, Garcia = 78

Rushing vs Bama.... UT = 76 yds/2.2 ypc, USC = 64 yds/2.4 ypc Push... and anemic for both

Drives that moved inside Bama's 30... UT = 6, USC = 4 Adv UT

Drives of more than 40 yards... UT = 4, USC = 2 Adv UT

Drives of 40 or more allowed... UT = 3, USC = 3 Push

Punt return yds allowed.... UT = 2 for 33 yds, USC = 5 for 75 yds Adv UT

Kick return yds allowed.... UT = 1 for 30, USC = 2 for 45 yds Adv USC

Punt return avg/yds... UT = 23/23, USC = 7/7 Adv UT

Kick return avg/yds... UT = 142/28.4, USC = 111/22.2 Adv UT

Turnover's for/against... UT = 1/1, USC = 4/2 Adv USC (But that is instructive in itself... TO's helped keep USC in it... Offense and Defense kept UT in it)

At no time was USC in a "should have won" situation. UT was there at least 3 times if you don't count the drive ended by a penalty. USC was able to hand on with Bama... UT OUTPLAYED AND OUTCOACHED Bama in every aspect except FG's. Even the other aspects of the kicking game were well played by UT.
Click to expand...


Garcia is ranked 35th and Crompton is 45th
http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2009&rpt=IA_playerpass&site=org&div=IA&dest=O
 
#59
#59
Gococks69 said:
Maybe...mabye not. But we are 6-2 right NOW. And after Saturday, we will be 7-2. I think you guys are power wannabees as well. Tit for tat. Honestly, noone is scared of UcheaT anymore. Havent been for quite some time.
Click to expand...

Cluck, cluck, cluck.

You frying hens sure do gab a lot.

Enjoy your yearly dose of Orange Crush for the next month or so; your tears of fail are nourishing to UT, UF, and Clemson and have been for decades.


MMM! Chicken!
I'll bring the syrup if you bring the hot sauce!
 

Attachments

  • Cocks and Waffles.jpg
    Cocks and Waffles.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 86
#60
#60
In what? 4 pages of facts and thats what you come up with?

Thats like saying Crompton is a better QB than Tebow cause Crompton has more TD passes.

Referring to a earlier post where you pointed out yall had played 8 games to our 7, Crompton has 4 more TD passes in one less game.
 
#61
#61
Gococks69 said:
Maybe...mabye not. But we are 6-2 right NOW. And after Saturday, we will be 7-2. I think you guys are power wannabees as well. Tit for tat. Honestly, noone is scared of UcheaT anymore. Havent been for quite some time.
Click to expand...

The word Cock and 69 in your screen name? Wow.
 
#63
#63
Also in addition to that list, just look at the names on that list. Anyone who thinks half of those QB's are the "best" in college football is a idiot. I agree with Casey Keenum, etc. The fact that Tim Hiller is above Colt McCoy or Dwight Dasher (I bet your guessing who?) is above Garcia, Crompton, Jacory Harris, Ryan Mallett, Snead, Tebow (who is 94th) are all examples of why that list means absolutely nothing.
 
#64
#64
utvolpj said:
I tried to access their site and it says my IP is banned from there :dunno: I'm at work and don't think I've ever gone there before. Must be a troll here in the building
Click to expand...

maybe...or the fact that the word 'cock' is in the url :) :question:
 
#66
#66
Guys don't worry about the shamecocks. They are going down and it will start their annual slide as they approach the orange corner of their schedule----UT, FLA and Clemson. They have never even got close to smelling the SECChampionship in Atlanta and this year will be no exception. In fact, I wager that we will playing in a BCS game before they ever see Atlanta. They have one championship in football and that was when they were in the ACC in 1969. Darth Visor isn't having much fun there in teh coaches graveyard. About time for them to find another aging coach past his prime. I think Heyden Fry is still alive.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top