The running back situation yesterday. Sorry I didnt get home until 6am this morning and just woke up so I havent had a chance to gripe yet. Ok so we start Montario Hardesty and give him about 2 snaps the whole day, then Arian Foster goes in and has his normal mediocre day then we throw in LaMarcus Coker in the 2nd quarter and he busts a 40 yard run. Then we go Arian Foster except for 2 or 3 carries the rest of the game and Foster fumbles a ball which made the difference in the game. Why start Hardesty if your not going to play him, play your obviously infererior back the whole night, then you finally put in your best back he runs all over them and you pull him. What were Cutcliff, Fulmer, and Roper thinking?
Something I just dont understand
- Thread starter mattvols
- Start date
crazyguy
Offense U
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 13,364
- Likes
- 3,967
dobre_shunka
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 5,200
- Likes
- 10,766
Quote from article in Tennessean:
"LaMarcus is not quite as physical as he needs to be quite yet, as far as some of the protection things and a lot of what we were doing at the line against their pressure looks,'' Fulmer said, explaining the sparse number of touches Coker had. "And,'' Fulmer added, "I thought Arian was doing well.''
If I remember it was that pass blocking thing that kept Jamal Lewis on the bench his freshman year until midseason.
"LaMarcus is not quite as physical as he needs to be quite yet, as far as some of the protection things and a lot of what we were doing at the line against their pressure looks,'' Fulmer said, explaining the sparse number of touches Coker had. "And,'' Fulmer added, "I thought Arian was doing well.''
If I remember it was that pass blocking thing that kept Jamal Lewis on the bench his freshman year until midseason.
Advertisement
