mudhen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2011
- Messages
- 1,270
- Likes
- 2,094
Give each team 3 “injury” timeouts per Qtr. After that, you have to use your game timeouts if a player is injured. If a player is removed from the game using an injury timeout, he should be ineligible to participate the rest of the possession unless the team elects to use a game timeout.
Coaches guard game timeouts like gold. That would eliminate or greatly reduce fake injuries.
IMO:
A player injured sits out the rest of the quarter play is stopped for the injury. If the player returns to a later quarter and has a second injury resulting in the stoppage of play, the player is ineligible to return for that game. This is a player protection rule.
But then some will remain in the game with legit injuries. Player safety comes first.
I’m concerned that a new rule would be implemented, and then we’ll get jammed by the new rule (sitting out a key player for a whole drive after a cramp or something)
Not allowing the defense to sub extra players (unless the offense subs) would be a great start, and would prevent a lot of what happened last night (basically unlimited time outs to sub out on D).
Side note: did y’all see Kiffin getting mad (and complaining to the ref) about us running the ball back to the ref in the middle of the field after an out of bounds play? He tried to sub after the out of bounds, and got caught with too many on the field.
Here’s the deal guys, no coach is going to support a rule that prevents him from playing a star player who can play. They’d rather stay with the current system than get beat with their best player not playing cause of an injury rule that they can’t control.
Yep. Over corrections are bad in general too.
Limiting substitutions to only the injured would get agreed to, and may send a message to cut it out.
Coaches have done a great job reteaching tackling. Targeting is only called 1 out of 4 games & usually it’s a bang/bang call where neither guy could help it