PineyBluff Vol
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2005
- Messages
- 4,313
- Likes
- 2,290
What a jerky, arrogant post! I was simply making the point that high school numbers and stardom does not necessarily correspond to college productivity. We should be cautiously optimistic. Does that make sense, Snotty?
You are a drive-by snobster who shoots down people's posts with little to no credence to what you are saying.
Your earlier preachy post insinuated that I was taking a stab at coaching and recruiting as the culprits behind 3 high school stars' lackluster college careers. Multiple factors decided those outcomes respectively.
Later you said I was repeating what a million other posters had said. I was the 4th poster in this thread and the first to caution against getting hopes too high and putting undue pressure on a kid who has not batted against collegiate pitchers or had to rebound from an unfortunate injury while her durability is being challenged with a lengthy college schedule.
Your retorts are just brash and snotty.
So if a parent tapes their kids "A" on the refrigerator that is putting undue pressure on the kid? Let's not put undue pressure on the kids. So we shouldn't get our hopes high because the coaches are recruiting great players? You have a distorted point of view and if the coaches and players had that attitude they'd win at nothing.
Rhetoric and crafty sidestepping of the snotty lies you didn't address.
What are you talking about you psycho broad? The OP started the thread highlighting Logyn Lilley's amazing numbers and your response was.....
Encouraging but realize Cheyanne Tarango and Erin Gabriel were respectively "the stuff" coming out of high school too, but then college happened. And there was Cat Hosfield...
Again, should the coaches not recruit All Stars? What is your point that hasn't been made a million times before? That players don't come with a guarantee?