Berry4Heisman14
VOL til death
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2009
- Messages
- 13,837
- Likes
- 16,543
Admittedly I haven’t searched overly hard, but I have yet to find a good synopsis on Purdue this season.
I know they beat UM but looking at their record they don’t necessarily have a huge wow factor (I’m sure they’d say the same about us).
So for anyone who keeps up with them, what’s the skinny?
The receiver for Purdue (Bell) is going to be a tough cover the kid is really really good. But we have Tillman so they will have their work cut out for them too. Game is going to be a shoot out.My fear is that they have to rely on zone even more. UT's zone D sucks. I'm not sure why they didn't stop using it. That said, zone D success is often a measure of how the athleticism of a D vs the opponent's receiving corps. I haven't looked that deep at Purdue's receivers.
The bad news is that Burrell has been very vulnerable in man. Teams have consistently picked on him. UT doesn't have a ton of depth at CB unless Hadden can make a big leap between now and game time.
I think the zone D should do OK allowing them to move the ball while holding them to FGs. If that happens, I like our chances.My fear is that they have to rely on zone even more. UT's zone D sucks. I'm not sure why they didn't stop using it. That said, zone D success is often a measure of how the athleticism of a D vs the opponent's receiving corps. I haven't looked that deep at Purdue's receivers.
The bad news is that Burrell has been very vulnerable in man. Teams have consistently picked on him. UT doesn't have a ton of depth at CB unless Hadden can make a big leap between now and game time.
Alontae was not very good in man coverage eitherMy fear is that they have to rely on zone even more. UT's zone D sucks. I'm not sure why they didn't stop using it. That said, zone D success is often a measure of how the athleticism of a D vs the opponent's receiving corps. I haven't looked that deep at Purdue's receivers.
The bad news is that Burrell has been very vulnerable in man. Teams have consistently picked on him. UT doesn't have a ton of depth at CB unless Hadden can make a big leap between now and game time.
Teams threw away from him this year for the most part. Could be that he got better or that Burrell was just that vulnerable.Alontae was not very good in man coverage either
Me neither. Both played and made some plays. Time to step up big.I have some hope for Hadden, he seems to have a lot of upside. I really don't understand how he and Turnage didn't play more...
Me too. It opens up some opportunities for pass rush that a running QB burns. Purdue allows a few sacks.The fact that we have played the best QB's in the country already and Purdue's QB doesn't run makes me feel confident.
For certain. And as dependent as Purdue is on their QB... I'm not sure you shouldn't invite him to run by blitzing.I mean we had Pickett, Corral and Young beat multiple times if not for their ability to run.
Gotta be aggressive. When you have superior speed and athleticism you try and impose your will!Teams threw away from him this year for the most part. Could be that he got better or that Burrell was just that vulnerable.
Me neither. Both played and made some plays. Time to step up big.
Me too. It opens up some opportunities for pass rush that a running QB burns. Purdue allows a few sacks.
For certain. And as dependent as Purdue is on their QB... I'm not sure you shouldn't invite him to run by blitzing.