SJW Culture, Pride Parades, Tolerance and such

200.gif
 
Mind your pronouns
 
It was already tanking, but SI swimsuit destroyed an institution. What a joke.
It's racist to not be attracted to all women, even if they happen to have a penis. Smh. Bigot.
 
It's racist to not be attracted to all women, even if they happen to have a penis. Smh. Bigot.
The twitter comments really read as that!! Do they even print the magazine anymore or is it just digital? So much for the glory days of Kathy Ireland and Elle MacPherson. Guys are gonna be going to model parties in NYC like Crocodile Dundee
CB2FE0B8-0249-47C9-B5BF-5256C917F197.gif
 
The twitter comments really read as that!! Do they even print the magazine anymore or is it just digital? So much for the glory days of Kathy Ireland and Elle MacPherson. Guys are gonna be going to model parties in NYC like Crocodile Dundee
View attachment 292305
Not sure. I think they still print them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RDU VOL#14
The twitter comments really read as that!! Do they even print the magazine anymore or is it just digital? So much for the glory days of Kathy Ireland and Elle MacPherson. Guys are gonna be going to model parties in NYC like Crocodile Dundee
View attachment 292305

And the Married With Children "Calendar Girl" Episode:

340
 
  • Like
Reactions: RDU VOL#14
The twitter comments really read as that!!
Yes, that is the consensus opinion among the wokists.

Is Refusing to Date Trans People Transphobic?

Similarly, imagine a date thatโ€™s going well. Thereโ€™s mutual physical attraction and definite chemistry. Then you find out theyโ€™re transgender via conversation (yes, everyone still has their clothes on), and end the date right then and there. But for the fact that the other person was transgender, this would have been a really good date, and you probably would have seen them again. This is discrimination against the transgender person for being transgender

1984 just about 35 years late.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RDU VOL#14
Similarly, imagine a date thatโ€™s going well. Thereโ€™s mutual physical attraction and definite chemistry. Then you find out theyโ€™re a serial murderer of children via conversation (yes, everyone still has their clothes on), and end the date right then and there. But for the fact that the other person was a serial murderer of children, this would have been a really good date, and you probably would have seen them again. This is discrimination against the murderer for being a murderer.
 
Similarly, imagine a date thatโ€™s going well. Thereโ€™s mutual physical attraction and definite chemistry. Then you find out theyโ€™re a serial murderer of children via conversation (yes, everyone still has their clothes on), and end the date right then and there. But for the fact that the other person was a serial murderer of children, this would have been a really good date, and you probably would have seen them again. This is discrimination against the murderer for being a murderer.

You just have to spell it out up front. Some people prefer blonds. Some brunettes. Some real. Some fakies. Some au natural. Some fully groomed. When this comes up, you just have to man up and lay it out there: โ€œif you have or ever had a twig and berries, itโ€™s a deal breaker.โ€
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
You just have to spell it out up front. Some people prefer blonds. Some brunettes. Some real. Some fakies. Some au natural. Some fully groomed. When this comes up, you just have to man up and lay it out there: โ€œif you have or ever had a twig and berries, itโ€™s a deal breaker.โ€
The problem is that it is discrimination and prejudice.

The question is: At what point do I have a right to my prejudices? In who I work for? In who works for me? In who I am friends with? In who I have sex with?

It's just anti discrimination taken to the point of no limiting principle.
 
Ec10qZ4WoAMvmY3.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boca Vol
Advertisement

Back
Top