Shroud Of Turin: New Evidence.

#102
#102
See, I think dried blood exposed to air is supposed to be more apt for damage... But I don't know that. You would think at the rate our technology is advancing in genetics technology, it's only a matter of time until it overtakes those sorts of difficulties though.
 
#105
#105
orangeblooded2 said:
This also:


The Shroud of Turin


Just gives arise to more question, suppositions and positional pandering....
Click to expand...

I saw that site as well. They make an interesting argument with the discrepancy in burial practices from Jewish tradition at the time and the way the shroud suggests he was buried, but to an extent one can give a benefit of the doubt to the exact method of burial. It was customary for an executed body to be buried in a common grave for a year after death, and then moved to a family spot. The Bible itself said something different happened, so it is already known that Christ's burial wasn't typical. Also, what if the shroud was only used temporarily? That would mean that the markings weren't from the resurrection as many suggest, but...
 
#108
#108
oklavol said:
That's my opinion. I thought they carbon dated the cloth, and determined it wasn't old enough to exist during the time of Jesus.
Click to expand...

Need to watch the show... apparently the piece they carbon dated was a section that had been added to the shroud to repair some damages.
 
#109
#109
KB5252 said:
There have been many experts disagree on many different aspects of the Turin shroud. So much so that at best I think you call the tests inconclusive. It will be interesting to see what new info, if any, comes from this show.
Click to expand...

The overwhelming majority agree with the conclusion that the shroud dates back to 1260-1390 AD -- 95% confidence. That's hardly inconclusive.

The claim by some that a fire has affected the accuracy of the carbon dating process is a ridiculous one. Any amount of carbon that would be enough to affect the dating would be clearly noticeable.

The whole concept of the shroud is a joke anyway. How it's held in such high regard among some is amazing to me.
 
#110
#110
Different weave patters from where the the dated sections were taken was so obviously a repair job that it is now considered factual among even the most objective scientist involved.
 
#112
#112
Sabanocchio said:
The overwhelming majority agree with the conclusion that the shroud dates back to 1260-1390 AD -- 95% confidence. That's hardly inconclusive.

The claim by some that a fire has affected the accuracy of the carbon dating process is a ridiculous one. Any amount of carbon that would be enough to affect the dating would be clearly noticeable.

The whole concept of the shroud is a joke anyway. How it's held in such high regard among some is amazing to me.
Click to expand...

This isn't true.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#117
#117
VolsNSkinsFan said:
Nope, because you claimed you watched the show, but not once in this thread you said "hey I just watched it and..."
Click to expand...

Whatever, dude. I guess you just have faith that I'm lying about having watched a particular television program. You are really displaying a great deal of foolishness to me. It doesn't matter, as it seems you obviously are not capable of having a rational conversation with me.
 
#118
#118
IPorange said:
Whatever, dude. I guess you just have faith that I'm lying about having watched a particular television program. You are really displaying a great deal of foolishness to me. It doesn't matter, as it seems you obviously are not capable of having a rational conversation with me.
Click to expand...

Well, his name does rhyme with ball skin fan...TIFWIW
 
#119
#119
IPorange said:
Whatever, dude. I guess you just have faith that I'm lying about having watched a particular television program. You are really displaying a great deal of foolishness to me. It doesn't matter, as it seems you obviously are not capable of having a rational conversation with me.
Click to expand...

Kinda pointless having a conversation with a liar and someone who likes to use profanity on a message board to try to intimidate me

Have a nice day

:hi:
 
#124
#124
therealUT said:
No thanks; maybe we can use tax dollars to try and prove if Cyclops existed (since, he was one of the sons of Poseidon).
Click to expand...

images


Clearly, more research is needed with such an artifact in existence.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top