I'm all for jerking the NCAA around some but how does "plausible deniability" work after the university fired 3 coaches "with cause" and multiple staff and had a public press conference where the Chancellor and President said they were shocked at the violations?The time for negotiating will come and hopefully the University will be well represented by a legal staff that knows how the game is played. Until then, admit nothing, adhere to plausible deniability protocol and remediate the damages to the least extent possible. If you offer up punishment, the NCAA can either laugh at how stupid we think they are if we low ball them or wonder what else we've got to hide if we make a substantial settlement offer.
Let lawyers do lawyer stuff...
Well, my question would be, if we gave up this season for a bowl game, and say that we win, then they don’t do anything then I say we just punished ourselves. What if they punish us in 2022-2023, and not 2021?
I’m all for saying the hell with NCAA, but the problem with that approach is that it can keep you in NCAA purgatory and other teams can use that against you in recruiting . I think we’ve gone too far down the rabbit hole with our self reporting .I say no to self-punishment. Seal what the Admin has already found (if possible) then make the NCAA dig and scrape to put together the pieces themselves. It'll take years for them to do anything and there's a good chance they won't learn the full extent of it. Missouri already proved that helping the NCAA does nothing but give them ammunition for free and doesn't buy you any brownie points when it comes to punishment. Make the NCAA do their jobs, find what they can find, and then take your lumps. I know we're the Volunteers, but sometimes it's best to keep your files shut and say "prove it."
I'm all for jerking the NCAA around some but how does "plausible deniability" work after the university fired 3 coaches "with cause" and multiple staff and had a public press conference where the Chancellor and President said they were shocked at the violations?
Since negotiations with Pruitt's attorneys in his lawsuit might overlap negotiations with the NCAA over sanctions, we might actually be arguing we don't know anything to the NCAA while we're touting all the stuff we know in the Pruitt case.
And the winner is....... the lawyers.
I wouldn't say "everybody knows" much about why Pruitt and Co were fired "with cause." The general public has heard that "serious violations occurred" and rumors and little more.Firing 3 coaches with cause is based on what everybody knows. You don't think there are others that are implicated to lesser degrees (hopefully) that might also lend to the NCAA's final decision? I do. If we're going to throw ourselves on a sword, do we go for a flesh wound or straight to the heart?
The lawyers always win, but their job is to protect their client to the greatest degree possible. What you feel guilty about and what you are guilty of are 2 different things. It all comes out in the wash. Why prematurely affect that?