Should the ethics report on Gaetz be released?

Should the ethics report on Gaetz be released ?

  • No, now that he's out of Congress it doesn't matter.

    Votes: 3 4.2%

  • No, it will make he and Trump look bad and who cares at this point

    Votes: 2 2.8%

  • Yes, a cabinet level pick should be fully vetted

    Votes: 37 51.4%

  • Yes, it will find it's way out in the end and better to deal with it now than have it linger

    Votes: 8 11.1%

  • Pie continues to rule

    Votes: 22 30.6%
  • Total voters
    72
#252
#252
volfanhill said:
Or, and hear me out here, she couldd hire competent prosecutors with a track record of success. I know that's a crazy idea.
Click to expand...

It really doesn't take much as you have criminals that have admitted to crimes to FBI, DOJ, and on video. They need to hire someone that has the balls to prosecute, these people have already done all the work on themselves.

Elmer Fudd pulls Obama into a Grand Jury, you'll hear him claim the fifth or presidential immunity very quickly after the first question. The funny thing, they already have his testimony.
 
Last edited:
#253
#253
volfanhill said:
Or, and hear me out here, she couldd hire competent prosecutors with a track record of success. I know that's a crazy idea.
Click to expand...
For sure. There may be many issues requiring a special prosecutor. As long as the competent prosecutor is not going to just skim the surface of the issue and write a report with a sternly worded letter taking half a decade to complete.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#254
#254
LSU-SIU said:
YOu say you don't know if he is guilty of something (?) Yet, your whole post is taken from the stand point he is guilty and he has something to hide (and you believe he should hide).

Or maybe a better way to put it, he doesn't act like he did anything wrong because maybe he didn't do something wrong.

This is the kind of stuff people are starting to reject.

P.S. if the story I linked is somewhat true, the public might never get the whole story i.e. classified and this might explain the retractions you are getting at some msm i.e. legal notices.
Click to expand...
What I was actually saying, is I didn't know enough of what was being alleged to have an opinion or judgement and that if he is innocent, he's innocent. And if he's not he's not. And politcal affiliations, or any other affiliation, has no bearing in my conscious when it comes to child/teen endangerment and exploitation. I didn't know enough of what had transpired with him to think much of anything about him, hence the exchange Septic and I were having.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
#255
#255
GVF said:
What I was actually saying, is I didn't know enough of what was being alleged to have an opinion or judgement and that if he is innocent, he's innocent. And if he's not he's not. And politcal affiliations, or any other affiliation, has no bearing in my conscious when it comes to child/teen endangerment and exploitation. I didn't know enough of what had transpired with him to think much of anything about him, hence the exchange Septic and I were having.
Click to expand...
Gotacha. 👍

Yeah. I don't know enough to have any real opinion either. Actually, what I posted today is about as much as I know, and I don't even know if that is true. Seems to make some sense with what is going on to a degree.

I just say they get anyone in there to indict Obama, Clinton and Biden they will go down as the GOAT. I don't care if its Elmer Fudd or Jerry Lewis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GVF
#257
#257
VOLLeeann said:
You didn't read the article and now here you are spouting crap. Happy is the fool
Click to expand...
I just read it. And very little was controversial. It was basically "she supports typical GOP stances. Evil." The only one I am in major disagreement with is her position on gay marriage. You want to know how I know you are a hack? You posted this article and this was the number one reason:

She's Good Pals With Rick Scott

Look at 'em. Like two white peas in a pod.


What trash is this? Do better
 
  • Like
Reactions: creekdipper
#258
#258
VOLLeeann said:
You didn't read the article and now here you are spouting crap. Happy is the fool
Click to expand...

Is it this article?

Eight Reasons Pam Bondi Is the Worst Attorney General in Florida History

Let's say I don't know anything about anything. I read the top one #8 and stopped there.

8. She Supported Arizona's Crazy Immigration Laws When Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer implemented her draconian immigration laws in Arizona that made it a federal crime for an immigrant to be in Arizona without carrying registration documents, and gave police the freedom to crack down on businesses suspected of hiring immigrants, she received a lot of blowback from other leaders around the country. But, Pam Bondi not only supported Brewer, but embraced her ideas by signing a friend-of-the-court brief in support of Brewer's law as it went to the Supreme Court.
Click to expand...

Does this make sense to you? You claimed (or implied) you read it, but do you see anything out of place? Asking for a friend.

For the record, I know nothing about this chick.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: creekdipper and SlipKidVol
#260
#260
SpaceCoastVol said:
Democrats must be ecstatic
Click to expand...

I started to read it and ran into a big oopps. I wonder if he/she realizes when someone says "did you read it" or similar it also implies comprehending what you read. Heck, I'm all open to reading whatever someone else posts but not sure what the point of it is when they didn't read it.

I don't even know where the article is going as I only read the beginning. 🍿
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top