Should the ethics report on Gaetz be released?

Should the ethics report on Gaetz be released ?

  • No, now that he's out of Congress it doesn't matter.

    Votes: 3 4.2%

  • No, it will make he and Trump look bad and who cares at this point

    Votes: 2 2.8%

  • Yes, a cabinet level pick should be fully vetted

    Votes: 37 51.4%

  • Yes, it will find it's way out in the end and better to deal with it now than have it linger

    Votes: 8 11.1%

  • Pie continues to rule

    Votes: 22 30.6%
  • Total voters
    72
#179
#179
DinkinFlicka said:
search.app

Gaetz withdraws as Trump's pick for attorney general

Matt Gaetz has withdrawn as President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for attorney general following scrutiny over a federal sex trafficking investigation.
search.app search.app

Guess he didn't want that report to drop.
Click to expand...
I don't care about him one way or the other but why would they withdraw pursuing the release of the findings? Should we know or not? To me it shouldn't matter if he's withdrawing or not, if we deserved the right to know that doesn't change now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tntar heel, InVOLuntary, Septic and 1 other person
#181
#181
GVF said:
If he allegedly committed crimes agiant minors, then investigations should be warranted and carried through. If you're a Dem pushing for this you should also be pushing for Epsteins Island and Diddy House to be fully exposed and investigated.
Click to expand...
All aboard that.
 
#183
#183
lawgator1 said:
First, I'm not a Dem as of about 3 or 4 months ago.

Second, even if I was, I'd be supremely pissed off if my newly elected POTUS selected so many people with obvious problems putting the party in the unenviable position of having to try to defend it! (Why you all are ok with Trump doing this to you ill never understand)

Finally, I'd be SUPREMELY pissed off if my newly elected POTUS and party then worked to block release of a report of such serious allegations against the AG nominee.

In the end, this is just validating critics' complaints before the election that Trump = undisciplined chaos. Again.
Click to expand...

🤣😂🤣😂

Lol nobody buys this 🐎 💩
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and volfanhill
#185
#185
If there is a 2nd that was uncovered by the ethics investigation, then let's see him charged...if not I have a feeling this is just more smearing by the left...with no real evidence
 
#187
#187
Forty-five minutes after CNN contacted Trump's attorney general nominee about additional allegations of sexual misconduct, he was done. Cooked. Finito. During a 2021 interview with Tucker Carlson, Gaetz vehemently denied the allegations that he had sex with a teenager.

Liar.

Pants on fire.

Idiot.
 
#188
#188
Matt Gaetz has pulled himself out of the running to be Donald Trump’s attorney general. Joel Leppard speaks to The Daily Beast Podcast about representing two women accusing Matt Gaetz of paying for “sexual favors.”

Oopsies, Mattie.

 
#189
#189
C-south said:
🤣😂🤣😂

Lol nobody buys this 🐎 💩
Click to expand...


I loathe Trump. Would have voted for virtually anyone over him. I voted against him, not for Harris.

My decision to leave the Dem party goes back at least two years when the Florida Dem party put up Charlie Re-Tread Crist in the gubernatorial race v. DeSantis. I did not vote on that line. Have been annoyed for more than that cycle at the state party's ineptitude.

When the Dems went with Harris with pretty much no even hint of consideration of anyone else, that was the straw, given how off-putting she was. My enthusiasm for her was occasionally boosted by her debate performance versus numnuts, for example, but in the end I just think the Dem party is too far left for me on too many issues such that I'm more accurately NPA.

That I still hate Trump and think him a con man does not make me a Dem in perpetuity.
 
#190
#190
lawgator1 said:
I loathe Trump. Would have voted for virtually anyone over him. I voted against him, not for Harris.

My decision to leave the Dem party goes back at least two years when the Florida Dem party put up Charlie Re-Tread Crist in the gubernatorial race v. DeSantis. I did not vote on that line. Have been annoyed for more than that cycle at the state party's ineptitude.

When the Dems went with Harris with pretty much no even hint of consideration of anyone else, that was the straw, given how off-putting she was. My enthusiasm for her was occasionally boosted by her debate performance versus numnuts, for example, but in the end I just think the Dem party is too far left for me on too many issues such that I'm more accurately NPA.

That I still hate Trump and think him a con man does not make me a Dem in perpetuity.
Click to expand...

Man you really didn’t need to type all this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#191
#191
Is Hegseth next? Betcha!

Prosecutors just released damning evidence that spells doom for Pete Hegseth, Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense. This won’t end well for either of them

 
#193
#193
GVF said:
If he allegedly committed crimes agiant minors, then investigations should be warranted and carried through. If you're a Dem pushing for this you should also be pushing for Epsteins Island and Diddy House to be fully exposed and investigated.
Click to expand...

Have dems tried to protect epstien investigations or diddy parties?

I can't imagine any sane person haveing the balls to die on that hill.
 
#194
#194
Septic said:
Have dems tried to protect epstien investigations or diddy parties?

I can't imagine any sane person haveing the balls to die on that hill.
Click to expand...
I believe there are many actively thwarting an Epstein investigation. I have no doubts some are dems.

Some of the recently paid Harris supporters were also know to frequent Diddy parties
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsAgainstTheWorld15
#195
#195
volinbham said:
Glad he dropped out but the DOJ did investigate. A Congressional ethics investigation isn't a criminal investigation.
Click to expand...

I thought I saw a report where there were lots of co-mingling between the investigators and ties to Gaetz's business partners. It didn't sound that far fetched to see a well connected congressman get the benefit of the doubt. Backroom shenanigans like Acosta's deal with Jeff Epstien comes to mind.
 
#197
#197
utvolpj said:
I believe there are many actively thwarting an Epstein investigation. I have no doubts some are dems.

Some of the recently paid Harris supporters were also know to frequent Diddy parties
Click to expand...

My guess is that those actively thwarting an Epstein investigation have some skin in the game, if you know what I mean. Diddy parties too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#198
#198
Septic said:
My guess is that those actively thwarting an Epstein investigation have some skin in the game, if you know what I mean.
Click to expand...
I sure they do. They also have a lot of power and more to lose if things are made public
 
#199
#199
lawgator1 said:
First, I'm not a Dem as of about 3 or 4 months ago.

Second, even if I was, I'd be supremely pissed off if my newly elected POTUS selected so many people with obvious problems putting the party in the unenviable position of having to try to defend it! (Why you all are ok with Trump doing this to you ill never understand)

Finally, I'd be SUPREMELY pissed off if my newly elected POTUS and party then worked to block release of a report of such serious allegations against the AG nominee.

In the end, this is just validating critics' complaints before the election that Trump = undisciplined chaos. Again.
Click to expand...
Lol. You wouldn't be pissed if a Democrat did anything.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top