OldVol
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2005
- Messages
- 1,973
- Likes
- 668
I voted yes.
I forget the exact circumstances, but in 64 a particular governor issued an ultimatum that looters would be shot on spot. 3 looters were shot early after that and that ended the looting.
Looters of non-essential items commit a horrible crime against all of those who are attempting to recover from this great tragedy. Honest people who take food, clothing, blankets and items that can only be constured as essential will leave a note, or advise secruity in the area of their intentions.
Looters who are carrying arm loads of jeans, jewelry, sneakers, and electronic items are the lowest form of humanity.
If a person has lost their clothing and they need a couple of changes of clothing, no one would be opposed to that. Taking jewelry and large amounts of clothing or other non-essentials is a crime of the highest sort in this ravaged area.
I forget the exact circumstances, but in 64 a particular governor issued an ultimatum that looters would be shot on spot. 3 looters were shot early after that and that ended the looting.
Looters of non-essential items commit a horrible crime against all of those who are attempting to recover from this great tragedy. Honest people who take food, clothing, blankets and items that can only be constured as essential will leave a note, or advise secruity in the area of their intentions.
Looters who are carrying arm loads of jeans, jewelry, sneakers, and electronic items are the lowest form of humanity.
If a person has lost their clothing and they need a couple of changes of clothing, no one would be opposed to that. Taking jewelry and large amounts of clothing or other non-essentials is a crime of the highest sort in this ravaged area.