Setting Worley

#27
#27
I've suggested sitting Worley for a number of reasons. I can respect your opinion OP but I believe sitting Worley does not necessarily mean conceding anything nor a referendum on Worley. He's beat to **** and making poor decisions. He may still be the best QB for a season but for me that doesn't mean he's the best choice for this game at this time. All of his best games have followed him being out either due to injury or being benched.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#29
#29
A QB must have a good line. As great of a QB Payton is, he looked below average in last years Super Bowl due to a great defense of the sea hawks
 
#30
#30
Worley the last 3 games is a vastly different QB than the one that played the games prior. Sometimes the mercy rule is best for everyone even if the guy getting mercy would disagree,
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#32
#32
I think you sit him. An unhealthy Worley with a chance of losing him the rest of the season won't gain us much. Am I giving in to Bama... no but I am a realist. Worley has had moments of being a good quarterback and I want that Worley in the SC, Missouri, Kentucky, and Vandy game.
 
#37
#37
Sit, sat , sit, the result will be the same no matter who starts, that's the way things are right now daggumit. :shakehead:
 
#39
#39
Ahhhh, now I get it. This is one of those smokescreens.

Woody Quinn is poised to burst onto the CFB landscape this weekend folks. And all y'all can do is make fun of OPs grammar. :-o

It's Pass-SET-Hit. Its Worley to WQ all aldat for the kill baby.
 
#41
#41
jcv0010 said:
You mean sit?

How high are you right now?
Click to expand...

Do you think he had to be high to use "set" vs "sit". More of an education process don't you think? Was looking for the words "setted or satted" to appear somewhere in the paragraph.

At least he got the abbreviation for BS right.
 
#43
#43
This is one of those threads where you don't merge it. You let everyone blast the guy for not knowing how to properly use the english language to teach him a lesson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#45
#45
FLSTF-VOL said:
"To sit" is an intransitive verb. It describes an action undertaken by the grammatical subject of a clause, but it cannot take a direct object: the verb "to sit" does not express the kind of action that can be DONE TO anything.

"To set" is a transitive verb. It describes an action and needs a direct object because it describes the kind of action that is DONE TO something. That is, something or someone in the sentence has to be receiving the action expressed by the verb.
Click to expand...

This is VolNation, son. Got no room for learnin' verb properties. Somebody gonna kick you in the diction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#49
#49
Sudden Impact said:
Do you think he had to be high to use "set" vs "sit". More of an education process don't you think? Was looking for the words "setted or satted" to appear somewhere in the paragraph.

At least he got the abbreviation for BS right.
Click to expand...
Again:
"To sit" is an intransitive verb. It describes an action undertaken by the grammatical subject of a clause, but it cannot take a direct object: the verb "to sit" does not express the kind of action that can be DONE TO anything.

I am going to sit in this chair.
I have been sitting on this bench for hours.
Please seat Mr. Worley on the bench.

"To set" is a transitive verb. It describes an action and needs a direct object because it describes the kind of action that is DONE TO something. That is, something or someone in the sentence has to be receiving the action expressed by the verb.

We are going to set Mr. Worley on the bench because he is hurt.
Setting Mr. Worley on the bench is the only option.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top