Last I heard, Currie wouldn't answer the question whether he's spoken to Fulmer. Doubt they will ever work together again.
Currie reached out, Fulmer has not responded as of yet.
To avoid making Fulmer look bad, Currie has dodged the question when asked. But he has reached out. Butch is trying to help bridge the gap.
Forgot to add he backed into that Atlanta game!
1 year removed from playing in Atlanta. When was the last time we could say that?
You don't back into anything. He got there from winning other games.
Be like saying Florida backed into Atlanta. No they won, we were the team that lost.
The direction of the program post Fulmer wasn't etched in stone. There were a lot of possibilities based on who was hired. Had we known the level of incompetence in the UTAD, I'm sure most people would have chosen the status quo.It was time or at least a serious ultimatum given to fix it. But to say the man was bad for UT football is stupid. How has it worked out for us since he has been gone? Or do people think we are still digging out from the hole CPF left us in. Also I have wondered why people blame the Admin for the program now but not when CPF starting failing. If you go back to the time it started declining for CPF things had changed. Academic standards were changed for one that made it harder and
CPF did not handle that change well. If you go back and research you will find were former players were quoted saying that the changes made had messed up TN football. They said CPF was neutered by the AD dept at the end.
The direction of the program post Fulmer wasn't etched in stone. There were a lot of possibilities based on who was hired. Had we known the level of incompetence in the UTAD, I'm sure most people would have chosen the status quo.
At that time, the potential bungling of the AD couldn't be known and certainly wasn't an excuse to keep Fulmer. Perhaps, a better AD could have steered Fulmer back on course and avoided the debacle. Crazy that they hired a guy for AD that was instrumental in Fulmer's firing.