VFL-82-JP
Bleedin' Orange...
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2015
- Messages
- 20,362
- Likes
- 55,797
Aaron, you're saying "everyone" and "most" as if you have surveys from back then. But perhaps you don't; perhaps you're just extrapolating from what YOU knew at the time.Yeah...once again you're not hearing what I'm saying. Everyone knew about Penn State, paterno, and Sandusky. Most Vol fans didn't connect that to Schiano. That's just fact. Now, once the connection was made, people used it to justify their actions. Remember, people wanted Gruden or another big name. The search had been tied to so many different coaches at that point. The reason people were ok with Pruitt was because of Fulmer. People believed in Fulmer, and trusted Fulmer. As far as your Catholic statement is concerned, it's simply not true.
I can tell you for certain, I was already very aware of Schiano's alleged role in the Penn State scandal when word got out that Currie was courting him. My _first_ objection had to do with his lack of character, lack of values. His mediocre on-field results were a concern as well, but #1 was his slimy and abrasive character.
Were a lot of folks seeing it as I did? Seemed so to me. I remember several conversations on these boards about Schiano's character, his baggage, and us not wanting to be associated with him. So I know there were others. But I'm not self-focused enough to start throwing out "most" or "many" adjectives. I don't know.
And that's how it goes. We will probably never know what percentage of the revolt was about character versus win/loss records. Only thing we can say for sure: it was a mixture of both.
Go Vols!