DeerPark12
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 7,778
- Likes
- 14,688
I was just reading the post and I was like KnoxLikeUs just said all this but at the end I'm just happy we are close to the first game.
Spot on and if you read comments from other publications it only reinforces how crazy fans can be without research on any given topic.The majority of this thread perfectly illustrates why coaches would prefer to keep fans out of these things. Fans are crazy, and they often read too much into every little silly thing. Itās what fans do, but itās still crazy as hell.![]()
I actually don't mind all the speculation and such. These message boards were made for crazy fans to have a place to banter back and forth with other crazy fans. Unless a poster is here officially representing a newspaper or other trusted news outlet, then nobody is required to uphold journalists' ethical standards. Message boards aren't official news outlets. They are primarily supposed to be fun and entertaining for fans, and if we're lucky, sometimes informative. But I certainly don't expect credible sourcing here like I would if I were reading a newspaper with actual journalists.Spot on and if you read comments from other publications it only reinforces how crazy fans can be without research on any given topic.
Every team practice half court sets. Waste to much time running the full court just to setup and work on your half court sets. Game prep you work against the up coming teams best defenses no reason to run the full court to do that.The half-court condition makes sense to me. If UNC had trouble beating Tennessee's press, then they wouldn't be getting as much practice running their half-court sets. By making that request, UNC was assured they'd get the full benefit from the scrimmage.
UNC might have just requested we not press them for a half, but I doubt CKC would have agreed to that because it would be taking the LVs out of the very habits she's attempting to install with the 7 new players. Just playing half-court ball would be the logical compromise.
Given problems we had last year in our halfcourt defense, I think we probably benefitted from it, too.
I hope the LVs are spending lots of time on half court sets. The exact problem last year that led to a mid pack conference finish was lack of half court finesse both on offense and defense. I think we learned last year that while the running style is great and all, you can not live by that alone.Every team practice half court sets. Waste to much time running the full court just to setup and work on your half court set
Agreed.I hope the LVs are spending lots of time on half court sets. The exact problem last year that led to a mid pack conference finish was lack of half court finesse both on offense and defense. I think we learned last year that while the running style is great and all, you can not live by that alone.
I hope the LVs are spending lots of time on half court sets. The exact problem last year that led to a mid pack conference finish was lack of half court finesse both on offense and defense. I think we learned last year that while the running style is great and all, you can not live by that alone.
This "folks" wasn't upset that there was a switch. What upset me is the fact that we were there expecting to play a full scrimmage game and it was changed without prior knowledge that we would be working on half court offense.Yeah, that is why i am puzzled about folks getting up in arms over the "secret" scrimmage (allegedly) switching to a half court format in the fourth quarter...
This "folks" wasn't upset that there was a switch. What upset me is the fact that we were there expecting to play a full scrimmage game and it was changed without prior knowledge that we would be working on half court offense.
As a coach myself, I know that if I go into a situation prepared for one thing and something else is programmed..it makes me look unprepared and that affects my entire day. As a coach, I go into any situation, practice. Or game with a plan. And if that plan is altered not by my own doing it upsets my entire plan.
there is pretty much a page for every situation,,,and its antithesis![]()
The Importance of Adaptability in Leadership ā Loeb Leadership
Adaptability as a leader is key to success. Learn the importance of adaptability in leadership and how to develop it for lasting impact. What is adaptability in leadership? Find out now!www.loebleadership.com
As a point of clarification, adaptability and having a plan are not antithetical. Adaptability means revising your plan in response to unexpected circumstances.there is pretty much a page for every situation,,,and its antithesis
![]()
Why Planning is Essential for Leadership Success - Insights Newsletter
By Jonathan Eisler, VP, AllOne Consulting, Team Leadership Vision alone isnāt enoughāleaders must turn vision into reality through effective planning and execution. The best leaders donāt leave success to chance; they create strategic plans that align goals with actions, ensuring teams stay...allonehealth.com
You go into a practice with no plan and ready to adapt unexpected circumstances...I'll go into a practice with a plan and we'll see who accomplishes moreAs a point of clarification, adaptability and having a plan are not antithetical. Adaptability means revising your plan in response to unexpected circumstances.
Google on "false dichotomy." Where did going into practice with no plan come from anyway? Per my previous post, "Adaptability means revising your plan in response to unexpected circumstances."You go into a practice with no plan and ready to adapt unexpected circumstances...I'll go into a practice with a plan and we'll see who accomplishes more
But wait, we have more cheetahs this season!!! It does not change the dynamic that much. The better teams will handle the LV press and not let the game turn into a fast break fest. Good 3 pt. Shooting and half court execution remains a necessary component of a deep run in the NCAA tournament.
I understand that anyone suggesting that the LVs might even have one game where they will need a good half court offense to win is a HATER, who has no excitement for the season and has deemed the cheetah theory a bust. Such people must be stoned to death. But before my final breath exits my body under the weight of my deserved punishment, a few last words. Last season, Spencer, Boyd, Whitehorn, Cooper, Spearman, and Latham were fast players (that is 6). Spear was not a cheetah but she was not a sloth either. Hollingshead was very mobile for a 6-5 player.I think the jury is out on whether it "does not change the dynamic". I mean, shoot, we still haven't seen a single game of play with this rebooted roster, and we're already throwing in the towel on the idea that we could give even the best teams trouble? I'd like to see our pressure struggle at least once before assuming that this defense won't hold teams under 70 points way more often than last year's. (vs last year's team that gave up 93 to Liberty, 75 to Memphis and Middle...)
I mean, you're as free to speculate as much as I'm speculating here, of course. It does seem to me that you think that this year's team will only have marginally better pressure than last year's team, in spite of the difference in athleticism. Is that a fair assessment of your take?
"Well, we saw last season, that good teams (and sometimes even middle of the road ones) can slow the tempo down and force the cheetahs to run half court sets."
Did last year's roster even have 5 cheetahs? I think we're doing waaay better than that this year. Stepping up in the place of some graduating non-'cheetas' we've got players that Kim has especially targeted, with her system particularly in mind. (rather than inheriting those players regardless of athletic fit, arguably to the detriment of the efficacy of our full-court -- altho Darby, Spear, and Hollingshead made up for it offensively to varying extents)
Again, I'd say let this season play out a bit before concluding that cheetah theory is a bust.
Just #1 simple fact if you're not working on half court sets well then you're not coaching. It doesn't matter if you're just going to give it to someone and dribble drive in the half court. Spacing is really important in the offensive sets .I understand that anyone suggesting that the LVs might even have one game where they will need a good half court offense to win is a HATER, who has no excitement for the season and has deemed the cheetah theory a bust. Such people must be stoned to death. But before my final breath exits my body under the weight of my deserved punishment, a few last words. Last season, Spencer, Boyd, Whitehorn, Cooper, Spearman, and Latham were fast players (that is 6). Spear was not a cheetah but she was not a sloth either. Hollingshead was very mobile for a 6-5 player.
Now the LVs have more speed depth this season but let me reverse your āall ināstance with this question, my prior post said that it is good the LVs are working on their half court offense in the preseason. You took strong exception to that claim.
Is your all in stance that CKC should not waste any time on half court sets? If yes, then add a few more stones to my pile and if not, then please take a few off.
We understood lolSince half-court play was Tennesseeās Achilles heel last season, opposing coaches will be hoping that it will again be the weakest part of our game. Considering Kimās system and the roster she has this year, itās pretty much a given that the half-court WILL be our weaker spot, so Kim knows sheās got to have this team quite a bit better in the half-court this season. We donāt have to be GREAT at it, but weāll have to be better at it than we were last season. Enough better at it that itās not the biggest reason we lose if we arenāt.
What did I just type? Good grief.![]()
