SEC Media Poll

#28
#28
That's just it though, they weren't very talented, and "highly ranked" doesn't equate to major contributors at the college level. Hall and Woolridge were terrible, and Cam was only slightly better.

I don't see anyone arguing definitively that one team was better than the other. Right now, this Tennessee team is a total mystery, but the bar wasn't set high by half the players you mentioned as being talented and highly ranked.

My original comment was to the poster that said this team has "wayyy better players here now then when ccm was here for his first year".
 
Advertisement



Back
Top