pretty much every scifi movie set in space gets dropping out of lightspeed/some high speed wrong. they always show the crew making big lurch forward as if they were dealing with a car coming to a sudden stop, not from above light speed to some relatively slow pace. it would be orders of magnitude more forceful and would smash them to smithereens. There would have to be some way to compensate for that sudden drop of speed, or else it would have to be an incredibly long process. and it seems strange to think they reduced the impact of that reduction from matter-shattering down to something we can relate to, and just stop there as if a large crew could safely operate under those conditions.
also most show asteroid fields as being chock full of big asteroids. they are actually mostly empty, and in pretty much every case if the fields were that populated it would be quicker to maintain speed and go around, rather than having to constantly accelerate/de-accelerate and make course corrections to avoid the clutter at some speed humans could actually react to in a meaningful manner.
also most tend to show space ships steering via fixed engines. there would still have to be some sort of rudder or ability to physically move those engines in order to change direction. or you would need a set of secondary fixed engines spaced all over the ship to effect significant course changes.
most did get it right that we would integrate physically with technology, I-Robot. we haven't gotten to the point of it being pretty just yet. but there are powered/smart prosthetics out there. and if Musk gets his way there will be chips in heads soon.
