ClearwaterVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2008
- Messages
- 16,193
- Likes
- 17,795
Based upon the possible hearsay of one coach(McQueary) supposedly telling another coach(Bradley) that Schiano reported an incident to him years before the first coach (McQueary) came forward. Schiano had been gone for 6 years when McQueary witnessed Sandusky.Schiano was an enabler, dumbass, if you actually read the reports and evidence. Guess you ARE that stupid.
Vol fans weren't satisified with acting stupid and embarrassing themselves one time--with their adolescent pining for Gruden--when there was absolutely no chance of him coming. No, they're embarrassing the university a SECOND time with their idiotic complaints about Schiano, as if Sandusky was his responsiblity. Freakin' morality crazies--and here's the kicker: These are the same goofs who voted for Trump--admitted molester of women. Go back to your rocks.
Based upon the possible hearsay of one coach(McQueary) supposedly telling another coach(Bradley) that Schiano reported an incident to him years before the first coach (McQueary) came forward. Schiano had been gone for 6 years when McQueary witnessed Sandusky.
Both Bradley and Schiano testified under oath that it didn't happen. How do you know that McQueary didn't have it in for both the other 2 men who were coaches at Penn State when McQueary was a player there? You saw what Jennings thought about his coaches, didn't you?
I called you a dumbass because you have no idea what Schiano saw or didn't see, yet you believe one man's testimony over two, and you don't know any of them. There is enough doubt that no reasonable, intelligent person should hate Schiano based on possible hearsay.
We run this town!!!! The power is with the people! 😂