It's all good.
Besides, you live in my hometown...you can't be all that bad.
(Bishop Kenny Class of 1986)
Here is the reality on this straight from the ol ball coach who considers this his greatest victory over UT according to his brother and laughs about it to this day. UF has a huge advantage in the swamp in SEPT and that is a fact. I have been there and the heat and humidity is rough.
Prior to the 98 (ironically their NC year) season scheduling came up in the spring and UT wanted the K-town game moved to early November/ late October. The ol ball coach pitched a fit (according to his brother he did not want to play in cold weather) and UT relented. Does this make a difference? Ask Miami who has played BC late in the year.
It came up again after 01 and Foley brought up the FSU argument. Cry me a river, UT usually plays a tough out of conference opponent early in the year and was only requesting the K-town game be moved with usc.
Today it is a mute point and is not going to happen unless UT threatens something drastic like moving out which is not going to happen. So every SEPT when this game kicks off a certain ol ball coach is smiling.
![]()
It would be better to play UF late in the year---UT would have an advantage with cold weather, etc.
The better team usually wins regardless of weather, and regardless of when the game is scheduled.
No one has a so-called weather advantage currently. It's hot as Hades in Gainesville and Knoxville in September.
September day games in Gainesville are disgustingly hot. That's an advantage for the team that is in Florida year-round. Not a huge advantage, but an advantage.
If UT were to host UF in late November, the cold weather would be an advantage for the Vols.
It doesn't mean UF couldn't win the game, but surely you don't think a warm-weather school travelling to play in cold weather isn't at a disadvantage?
September day games in Knoxville are no picnic either. It's just as hot, and both teams are practicing in August. Again, there is no advantage for either team.
I don't think a warm weather team is at a disadvantage in colder weather, barring a snow storm or extreme wind. If UF had to play you guys at Lambeau Field in January, sure, we'd be at a disadvantage.
I guess we'll just have to disagree on this one then.
I don't see Florida ever playing a game in cold weather unless they're forced into it.
I'm guessing the last time Florida played a road game north of Georgia in November against someone besides Vandy was back in the day when they played Kentucky in November every year. I think the Gators prefer to avoid cold weather as much as possible. I'm not calling them out; I think it's smart scheduling.
FWIW, the last time UK beat Florida was in November. I was there, but I cannot remember a thing about the temperature (too long ago, lol).
eace2:
Last time we lost to UK was my freshman year at UF. We played them in November, and yes it was cold.
Coincidentally UF also sucked that year.
We played them up at Lexington in November in '88 and '90 also, and we beat them like stepchildren.
The coldest UF games I can remember were in Columbia (1995), UGA/Jax (1991) and FSU (2000). Surprisingly, the better team won each of those games regardless of the weather.![]()
If one team is a lot better than the other team, than the weather probably is going to make little difference. Also, every game you cited, except Kentucky, involved an opponent that I would classify as a warm-weather team, or at least mild, in the case of UGA and SCar late in the season. Obviously, FSU isn't going to enjoy cold weather any more than UF.
If two teams are closely matched, though, and one of them is located in a colder area, it will add to their homefield advantage if they get to host the game in cold weather.
