85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 37,384
- Likes
- 75,872
@hog88 weighed in… further right than you, and further down than me lolIm the farthest to the right so far....
@hog88 weighed in… further right than you, and further down than me lolIm the farthest to the right so far....
Somebody never enjoyed the parking lot at a Panic show….Same. I landed just one small square north and west of McDad and Hog.
However, the drugs question got me along with a couple of others. On one hand, if an adult wants to kill or damage themselves with illicit substances, then whatever dude, that's your poor decision. You also deprive the drug pushers of money, weakening them....at least somewhat. On the other hand though, illicit drugs are a scourge, a poison to our society. They serve absolutely zero positive purpose. They destroy far too many innocent lives and weaken far too many people not only physically, but morally. Families ripped apart. I know far too many victims, some were my friends.
Same thing with the victimless crime question. I can see both sides.
What if they told you to drive a Fiat?There’s another at least: to give the Biden / Harris agenda a rest for a while. I don’t like the government telling me what to drive and I especially don’t like it decided by fiat.
Trump’s terrible, no doubt. But a lot of what the Democrats were pushing was garbage and needed to stop.
I’ll take the quiz once my John Birch Society meeting finishes.

I can see that, but I also think of the collateral damage I've seen in my lifetime as well. I see nothing wrong with weed after someone's brain is fully developed if they choose to partake in THC, for the record.Somebody never enjoyed the parking lot at a Panic show….
And a legal adult should have the freedom to “destroy” themselves if they so choose.
The “collateral damage” to another’s family, while sad, is definitely none of your business, Karen.I can see that, but I also think of the collateral damage I've seen in my lifetime as well. I see nothing wrong with weed after someone's brain is fully developed if they choose to partake in THC, for the record.
That is exactly why that was a **** poll (for lack of a better word). The questions were to vague to be of any real value.Ha. Id be interested to know responses to each question and reasons. I’ve been called conservative my whole adult life but for example I don’t care who somebody loves or screws or what drugs they want to do until someone besides them is a victim or who they worship or who they vote for. Their choices. Pharma is govt approved and kills people daily by destroying their body or minds anyway.
Govt overreach is a problem but can’t have wild wild West either.
The spying question is a tough one for me. Don’t want to be spied on and nothing to hide but if spying on my neighborhood ends up stopping the dude around the corner from bombing a building or raping kids, I’m good with it. I don’t know where on the graph that lands me but again it’s why i mentioned some questions need a deeper dive. If spying on me saves 1000s of lives somehow, spy away.
Really? Do go on. Explain that to me.“Too open ended.”
Sounds just like a libtard would say.
Want someone to take the quiz for you, soy-boy?
almost off the graph,,lotta girth.View attachment 831494
The questions are poorly constructed. Many have two elements; concept / reason. Didn't know how to answer when I agreed with one but disagreed with the other.
It ain’t that deep snowflakeReally? Do go on. Explain that to me.
@Skooter actually articulated what I was saying. I didn't care if you **** goats or other men..... until you want special privileges because of that. Then I do. There are some black and white issues and some that aren't. You can't boil them down to this Cosmo quiz. It cracks me up has many of y'all are acting like this tells who you really are.
Should drugs be legal? I know a guy who is relapsing as we speak into heroine addiction. I don't GAF of you smoke weed, but he might kill himself. Should drugs be legal? You tell me. Congrats on making a very complex issue into a stupid ****ing Teen magazine quiz.
That was my struggle with a lot of the questions too. A lot of the questions I was saying, "well it depends". For example the following question: "A government that provides for everyone is an inherently good idea." Well yes I think that it is a good idea from the standpoint of a government providing as much equal opportunity to succeed as they can for its citizens, but from the standpoint of being offered up government handouts/welfare to everyone, absolutely not. In other words, it depends on what the government is providing. I'll just assume that that question is referring to handouts.That's not what the question asked. Yes or no.
See my point?
Just a joke, SCV. I'm just kidding around. I hoped the nature of the thread meant I didn't need blue font.Really? Do go on. Explain that to me
