You are mostly right. BB and Oku were probably victims of Kiffin's move. Both might still be at UT and might even be productive had he stayed. OTOH, UT probably would have had the book thrown at them by the NCAA.
Neal was a guy that DD scrambled to get in those last couple of weeks. He needed a RB. He seems to be a little bit of a disappointment.
I think Lane shows some flashes of being a very good RB. He has quicks and isn't afraid to get physical too. He needs decent blocking and a little time.
Eh, those lists are tricky.
BB was #1 overall player, not just RB in '09.
Oku was the #1 APB and #97 player in the nation in '09.
R Neal was the #9 RB in the nation in '10 and #151 player.
Lane came in at #23 RB and 4* in spite of injury.
The first two are simply head cases. Neal can't hang onto the football & gets benched and Lane is still a Fr.
It's just not as simple as making some star list.
Yeah cause BB won the job at KSU over those lowly 3* RB's and has been ripping the Big 12 to shreds... Oh, wait...
I tend to agree with the premise of the OP though. I argue against stars being the absolute standard for recruit talent. However if there is a position where they seem to mean more than others it would be RB IMO.
I haven't seen any signs of that. He might have it in him but he doesn't seem to be physical at all. He hasn't shown the ability to read holes and make cuts behind or at the LOS.
He looks like a WR running the football.
From what I see of y'alls recruiting, it appears to be like we were during most of the last decade (pre-Saban); getting decent, but not spectacular players. I know coaching is important, but if you don't have the horses, you can't win the race.The problem with the RB position is it is hard to find a diamond in the rough year after year. To be consistently great at the RB position (consistently being the key word) you have to at least target and recruit the top 10-15 backs in the country every year. Sounds like simple logic, but it doesn't seem like the staff seriously targeted the best backs in this upcomimg class.
From what I see of y'alls recruiting, it appears to be like we were during most of the last decade (pre-Saban); getting decent, but not spectacular players. I know coaching is important, but if you don't have the horses, you can't win the race.
The problem with the RB position is it is hard to find a diamond in the rough year after year. To be consistently great at the RB position (consistently being the key word) you have to at least target and recruit the top 10-15 backs in the country every year. Sounds like simple logic, but it doesn't seem like the staff seriously targeted the best backs in this upcomimg class.
The question is.. why would one of the best backs in the country consider Tennessee right now? That should change over the next couple of years. If it doesn't.. we'll likely be looking for a new coach. But I think it will.
I got curious and decided to look at all of these big huge bruising tailbacks i see around the SEC this year and wonder if any of them could've been diamonds in the rough on the recruiting trail. The results I found were not promising.
LSU- Spencer Ware 5 star
Michael Ford 4 star
Bama- Trent Richardson 5 star
Eddie Lacy 4 star
Jalston Fowler 4 star
USCj- Marcus Lattimore 5 star
UGA- Isaiah Crowell 5 star
Richard Samuel 5 star
Miss St- Vic Ballard 3 star
Auburn- Michael Dyer 5 star
All of these guys except for Ballard were big time recruits, all of them except Crowell have had multiple seasons in a strength and conditioning program, and all of these backfields have ran well for most of the year. This conference is a running backs league, and we simply don't have one. Tauren has heart, but he's just not good enough. Behind him we have true freshmen who are inexperienced and just not ready. No wonder we can't run the football. We need an immediate talent upgrade at the running back position, or we'll continue to watch a team that has to air it out to move the ball.