SuperVol81
Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2015
- Messages
- 9
- Likes
- 4
It would be a three way tie and work down this order
(Note: If one of the procedures results in one team being eliminated and two remaining, the two-team tiebreaker procedure as stated in No. 1 above will be used):
A. Combined head-to-head record among the tied teams
B. Record of the tied teams within the division
C. Head-to-head competition against the team within the division with the best overall Conference record (divisional and non-divisional) and proceeding through the division (multiple ties within the division will be broken from first to last and a tie for first place will be broken before a tie for fourth place)
D. Overall Conference record against non-divisional teams
E. Combined record against all common non-divisional teams
F. Record against the common non-divisional team with the best overall Conference record (divisional and non-divisional) and proceeding through other common non-divisional teams based on their order of finish within their division; and
G. Changed: Combined SEC record of the teams cross-divisional opponents
I don't understand. If we have one division loss (Fla) one sec west loss (ark) and one non conference loss, how would it look if Fla looses to Ga, LSU and FSU. If GA ties FLa and we tie Ga wouldn't our win against Ga trump?
It would be a three way tie and work down this order
(Note: If one of the procedures results in one team being eliminated and two remaining, the two-team tiebreaker procedure as stated in No. 1 above will be used):
1)How each team did among the vs the other two tied teams
2) Division Record of each tied team
3) Head-to-head competition against the team within the division with the best overall Conference record (divisional and non-divisional) and proceeding through the division (multiple ties within the division will be broken from first to last and a tie for first place will be broken before a tie for fourth place)
4) Overall record against opposite division teams
5) How they did against all common opposite division teams
6)Record against the common non-divisional team with the best overall Conference record (divisional and non-divisional) and proceeding through other common non-divisional teams based on their order of finish within their division
7) Combined SEC record of the opposite division opponents played by each team.
That's insane. Why would punishments be different based on who administered the test?