My sickening comment was made in response to another member's post stating, "I love how many attorneys we have on this board." I took that as tongue-in-cheek. Before I replied to that comment I noticed it was immediately followed by another lengthy post from you. I did not find any of your comments sickening as I did not read one word of that post, tho I sincerely believe they were probably astute and right on point. Apparently I struck a nerve with @deerpark, as I was also taken to task from that end. Interestingly enough, the two of you were the ones who came to mind when I made my comment. It seems there is some sort of competition to prove which is more knowledgeable about the Whitehorn matter. Do you remember that kid, probably around grade 5, who was jumping up and down,waving their hand, ask me, I know, I know, every time teacher asked a question? That was usually a very smart kid. But, to the rest of the students they were a pain in the butt. And, guess what? Lots of other kids knew the answer too. They just didn't need the constant validation.I think you are confusing a "logical argument" with a lawyer's brief. I am curious as to what part of this recent discussion you found to be "sickening." The posts in response to Ruby's plea deal have mainly been "that is a great outcome for Ruby. Now she can go on with her life" plus some comments related to when she might get back with the team.
What did you find "sickening" about such comments?
Last edited: