Ruby Arrested……

🤔 Though on second thought... we haven't had many police arrest incidents on Danny's watch, have we? I might be guilty of selective memory.

Jaylen McCollough October 2022 is the last one I can recall ... He was not dismissed and is now in the NFL.

Like with Tank, I've never had a reason to doubt Ruby's character. Therefore, I will be giving her the benefit of the doubt.
 
So when does this switch to be about CKC's response?
Monday, or Tuesday?

I wonder if Kim has ever had to deal with this before. I'm sure never before in such a media spotlight. Sadly glad that the UTAD has plenty of experience to offer on how to handle these things.

🤔 Though on second thought... we haven't had many police arrest incidents on Danny's watch, have we? I might be guilty of selective memory.
How did AD White handle the football He said Drunk said situation when the football player defended his domicile.

”We have thouroughly reviewed the facts and we will let the legal proceeding play out. In the meantime the player is innocent until proven guilty”

I bet we see a similar response with this She said, She said situation. By the time this case makes it to court, Ruby will be cutting down some nets…..
 
KPD certainly seems to aim high on their initial charges. Doesn’t burglary require that the defendant actually take something that doesn’t belong to them?
 
Aggravated burglary is a serious charge:



I suspect that this will be plead down to a much lesser charge, assuming it is not not dropped all together (fingers crossed). I am hoping for some significant mediating circumstances, cause this situation is way beyond skipping a class or other run of the mill violations of team rules.
I'm getting confused. So, she got aggravated at somebody and kicked in a door to "steal" something that belonged to her?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MicCheck12
I'm thinking it's unhinged and violent -- also super trashy -- to be breaking down multiple doors and breaking a glass mirror just to get a phone and an ID. Find someone with a phone, call the police, and let them go with you to retrieve your belongings.

Unless the other woman is a totaly lying psycho who kicked down the doors and broke the mirror herself in order to make Ruby look bad, then Whitehorn has some serious anger/judgement issues to deal with.

I'm glad no-one was physically injured, but even so, if the original report holds true, the pursuit had to go on for quite a while and was not just some split-second decision that went horribly, stupidly bad. Instead of ever thinking, "Whoa! What am I doing!? I need to leave!"... things escalated. Ugh.

I hope both women get counseling
It could just be a lover's disagreement, and both parties might kiss and makeup and the whole issue goes away
 
No, there is not a conspiracy here. This arrest has been classified as a case of domestic assault. News organizations have policies to protect the privacy of victims in cases of domestic violence.

In other words, the news media is following their standard protocol for reporting on a domestic violence incident. There is nothing strange, suspicious or conspiratorial about these news reports.
ahh..thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
News editor knows this is only a story because of who one of the people is.

And, who knows whether not identifying the other person was actually intended to protect Ruby from further damaging speculation by the public.

As my late wife used to say about breaking stories on any news network, "It's only an important story until they have the facts."
I dealt with the media as part of my job. They almost always left out some "facts" in order to make the story more sensational. Local TV stations were worse than the print media, or so it seemed to me.
 
I dealt with the media as part of my job. They almost always left out some "facts" in order to make the story more sensational. Local TV stations were worse than the print media, or so it seemed to me.
Well that’s not what happened here, WBIR posted the actual police report with the name redacted on their website next to their story. News is news, no legitimate organization intentionally leaves out relevant facts. Not all of the relevant facts may be made available to them, which is a key difference that many people miss.
 
Well that’s not what happened here, WBIR posted the actual police report with the name redacted on their website next to their story. News is news, no legitimate organization intentionally leaves out relevant facts. Not all of the relevant facts may be made available to them, which is a key difference that many people miss.
But isn’t it kinda their job to make some effort to find them and not just wait for someone to hand it to them? I mean if your rival station has information that you don’t and that information is a public record you didn’t bother to look for, that’s on you imo.

Talking about WATE omitting information that WBIR included.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
But isn’t it kinda their job to make some effort to find them and not just wait for someone to hand it to them? I mean if your rival station has information that you don’t and that information is a public record you didn’t bother to look for, that’s on you imo.

Talking about WATE omitting information that WBIR included.
Well, I don't do criminal law because as much fun as it was in law school, there's a lot more money to be made in contracts even if it is soul crushing (hence, why I spend so much time wasting time on message boards).

But I can tell you that the only document typically available to the press is the initial incident/arrest/police report and not follow-up reports with interviews, details, video recordings, witness interviews and statements, etc. There's nothing else for them to find, because everything past the initial report is held in the case file until a court date. Some of it may be revealed at the inital appearance, but its often held for a trial. If a case is resolved without a trial, most of it never sees the light of day. I worked on a murder case when I was an intern and it ended up with a guilty plea to a lesser charge because the county's investigation had some major problems with it. But none of that was publicly known, the media reports in Chattanooga would have made you think we were going to be crushed in a walkover. There was some minor public outcry over it because so many had read the initial reports and never saw the extra information. And the DA never released more information because they didn't want to throw the investigators under the bus. Not anybody's fault, just the way the system works.
 
Y'all way to easy and forgiving. If she was a Gator or Wildcat, then it would be kick her off the team or the laughing emoji.

I have no sympathy for people who put themselves in this spot
You were one of the idiots who jumped all over AJ Johnson before he was proven innocent, weren't you? SMDH
 
Move on = Turn a blind eye.

Wrong is wrong and should be dealt accordingly. I've said this for players on the football and men's BB team in the past. Being a Vol should not give them a pass.


As far as others using it for negative recruitment, I doubt this has any impact at all. Wins and the direction of the program will trump any negative vibes people want to put out there.

FTR, I'm a big supporter of CKC. I was pulling for her during the coaching search. This is nothing but a blip on the radar as far as the program is concerned
Is the concept of innocent until proven guilty to difficult for you to comprehend? Did you want AJ Johnson crucified?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knoxville Nation
Well, I don't do criminal law because as much fun as it was in law school, there's a lot more money to be made in contracts even if it is soul crushing (hence, why I spend so much time wasting time on message boards).

But I can tell you that the only document typically available to the press is the initial incident/arrest/police report and not follow-up reports with interviews, details, video recordings, witness interviews and statements, etc. There's nothing else for them to find, because everything past the initial report is held in the case file until a court date. Some of it may be revealed at the inital appearance, but its often held for a trial. If a case is resolved without a trial, most of it never sees the light of day. I worked on a murder case when I was an intern and it ended up with a guilty plea to a lesser charge because the county's investigation had some major problems with it. But none of that was publicly known, the media reports in Chattanooga would have made you think we were going to be crushed in a walkover. There was some minor public outcry over it because so many had read the initial reports and never saw the extra information. And the DA never released more information because they didn't want to throw the investigators under the bus. Not anybody's fault, just the way the system works.
I think it was just the initial report here. WBIR included it in their reporting and the other station just gave a summary that omitted some seemingly important details.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
Advertisement



Back
Top