RPI Discussion.

This was the last post before you went searching, note the bolded. You then returned with the posts, and said buh-bye.

If that's not accepting a bet, you're a damn liar, because you sure were expecting me to uphold my end and leave. If you're not man enough to hold up your end of a deal, just say so, I'm sure many will admire your honesty.

How you infer from that post that he is supposed to leave is beyond me. You said if he found it you'd leave. It was never recpriocated that he'd leave.
 
There are no ban bets. Let's move on. This is supposed to be an RPI discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Freak, can we start a BTO vs the entire bball forum thread? That's what every other one seems to turn into and I'm as guilty as anyone about getting involved.

:)

Differing opinions make the forum go round. BTO is passionate as are many others. Everyone just needs to keep it respectful. :hi:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
bleeding is like Bruin only worse. He loves trashing others posts but never backs up what he trashes. He loves Martin but then he acts like he does not mind if he is fired. Take a stand and stick to it man. Are you 12 years old or something? If you want to trash everyone's posts then prove your trashing instead of changing subject or blindly trashing posts and then scrambling to back up something that you never seem to be able to do. Bruin gave opinions, took a stand, and you might not like it but he had a few facts and even if wrong he stuck by what he believed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
bleeding is like Bruin only worse. He loves trashing others posts but never backs up what he trashes. He loves Martin but then he acts like he does not mind if he is fired. Take a stand and stick to it man. Are you 12 years old or something? If you want to trash everyone's posts then prove your trashing instead of changing subject or blindly trashing posts and then scrambling to back up something that you never seem to be able to do. Bruin gave opinions, took a stand, and you might not like it but he had a few facts and even if wrong he stuck by what he believed.

Examples....
 
Wow !!! You have some nerve!!! Just go back to the first time you slammed me and drifted off into other subjects without offering any proof I was incorrect. Then you had the nerve to bring it up again with still zero proof later on. I even challenged you on it and you ignored it. Ok, I have never blocked anyone on here but you are probably going to be the first. I doubt you ever played the game, I did. You show little to no understanding of the game. I am a busy person who does not have the time to get it a spitting contest with you. I'm 54 and followed the Vols in the Mears days until now through thick and thin. I have my perspective and you have yours. All I ask is in the future if you slam others you offer some proof instead of making wild accusations or hurling insults, than swiftly moving on and not backing up what you say. You want proof than look at almost any thread you have been in the last 3 weeks, in almost any conversation you have had. There is your proof. You may be a nice guy that just backed a nice coach for too long. We do not personally know each other, but after what happened last year on VN, I do not want to have bad feelings towards anyone on here. I agree that you disagree with me and let us just move this thing forward. Next time you have a problem with what I say please offer proof why I am wrong, do not say my post has inaccuracies and leave it at that. if I am inaccurate, show me the facts where I was incorrect. The error of my ways, so that not just I, but all of us can see. I am more than happy to reconsider my position if I am wrong. I actually take constructive and meaningful criticism rather well, and I recognize I am not all knowing on any subject.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Now 57 in rpi and listed as one of the last 4 in. Not at all where we should be with the kind of talent this team has.
 
Wow !!! You have some nerve!!! Just go back to the first time you slammed me and drifted off into other subjects without offering any proof I was incorrect. Then you had the nerve to bring it up again with still zero proof later on. I even challenged you on it and you ignored it. Ok, I have never blocked anyone on here but you are probably going to be the first. I doubt you ever played the game, I did. You show little to no understanding of the game. I am a busy person who does not have the time to get it a spitting contest with you. I'm 54 and followed the Vols in the Mears days until now through thick and thin. I have my perspective and you have yours. All I ask is in the future if you slam others you offer some proof instead of making wild accusations or hurling insults, than swiftly moving on and not backing up what you say. You want proof than look at almost any thread you have been in the last 3 weeks, in almost any conversation you have had. There is your proof. You may be a nice guy that just backed a nice coach for too long. We do not personally know each other, but after what happened last year on VN, I do not want to have bad feelings towards anyone on here. I agree that you disagree with me and let us just move this thing forward. Next time you have a problem with what I say please offer proof why I am wrong, do not say my post has inaccuracies and leave it at that. if I am inaccurate, show me the facts where I was incorrect. The error of my ways, so that not just I, but all of us can see. I am more than happy to reconsider my position if I am wrong. I actually take constructive and meaningful criticism rather well, and I recognize I am not all knowing on any subject.

Wow. Yet another person who doesn't get along with BTO. Anyone see a pattern here? Can anyone put one and one together?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I want to apologize right now for any part I have had in cluttering this thread up. I always get along with people and will try not to have any part of that in the future.

I agree that as time goes forward this season Martin's coaching for this year is more and more suspect. It could be argued that his best season here was the first one. Even if the tournament is made somehow this team which should have been his best has woefully under performed.
 
Were safely in with four wins. On the bubble with three. Out with two. So were got our back against the wall just like last season let us see what we do this time.
 
Did that really happen?

Yes, and then he tried to argue the semantics of the year in which he said it (like that f'n mattered) to try and deflect of how he said 7 SEC teams would make it in the tourney. If you would like a rehash, just go back and read the posts I originally linked. I'm not going to post it again. It's comical.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top