Matt2496
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2016
- Messages
- 14,270
- Likes
- 22,714
Resign / Fired was the prediction. Let's wait and see what happens. I always use the word "if" in front but it looks more and more like the Q stuff is coming out about as stated. Nobody is going to bat a 1000 on this. Things are fluid and things change. Q also said that NK would denuclearize. It appears that is a strong possibility. Also said Iran is next. They are on the block as we speak. Q said to watch for Noel Francisco months back. I doubt those are coincidences or lucky guesses. Again things are fluid and nothing is set in stone. I know you do not follow Q as closely as I do and I don't expect you to understand it all.So, are you gonna hang your hat of Q credibility on the Rosenstein resignation? So what if he's fired instead, will you still consider that an accurate prediction?
And if the FISA docs come up clean? Still gonna kick the Q can down the road?
Doubt it "Stretch Armstrong".Trump's tweet for Thursday is already written:
"John Kelly and I gave Rosenstein many opportunities to resign on fair terms but he refused and so I had to fire him."
Followed by words about witch hunts and such.
It's pretty obvious this is about attacking the people that are a threat to him, perpetuating the deep state conspiracy theory for the base, and undermining Mueller.
Not going to work. The truth shall set us free (of con man Trump).
Trump's tweet for Thursday is already written:
"John Kelly and I gave Rosenstein many opportunities to resign on fair terms but he refused and so I had to fire him."
Followed by words about witch hunts and such.
It's pretty obvious this is about attacking the people that are a threat to him, perpetuating the deep state conspiracy theory for the base, and undermining Mueller.
Not going to work. The truth shall set us free (of con man Trump).
Rosenstein has done significantly more harm to the DOJ's reputation than good. He deserves to be fired.
I predict Sessions will be gone after the midterms.
That investigation should have never happened in the first place.Not if he blocks Trump's effort to shut down the investigation. If he does that, a mysterious report of some betrayal by him will appear in the news and he will then be fired.
Brick by brick (like that?) Trump is attacking and breaking down the firewall between us and the truth of Trump's felonious activity.
All good points.working theory for consideration:
1. Comey investigation not turning up evidence of collusion (supported by Lisa Page testimony saying they had nothing by the time she left).
2. Comey (for what ever reason) still wants to get Trump out.
3. Comey knows Trump might fire him.
4. Comey, Rosenstein (who else) see opportunity if fired to appoint SC to dig into other things to find something AND/OR make case for obstruction.
5. Trump suggests firing Comey and RR agrees and volunteers to write the memo (NYT piece)
6. Comey (knowing it's coming) plants his evidence with his buddy and the plan is now in place.
7. Mueller appointed and investigation shifts to non-collusion items and obstruction case (NYT reporting of shift).
Inside job to get Trump. Latest leak is to clear RR out of the way for a couple reasons 1) add to the "Saturday Night Massacre" narrative - Schiff already out with the talking points - as "further" evidence of "obstruction". 2) RR had a conflict in an obstruction case given he was both a witness and participant in the Comey firing. As Mueller's boss that put him in a difficult situation. With him out he's free to be a witness against.
The big picture. Prior administration along with DNC/Hillary campaign saw a chance to label Trump as collaborator with Russia. Used Intel Community to build case. Case doesn't have merit. Plan B - obstruction or anything else we can find - need SC with broad mandate.
Prior leaders of IC desperate to prevent information about how this went down explaining Brennan's recent public insanity and call for insubordination.
Not if he blocks Trump's effort to shut down the investigation. If he does that, a mysterious report of some betrayal by him will appear in the news and he will then be fired.
Brick by brick (like that?) Trump is attacking and breaking down the firewall between us and the truth of Trump's felonious activity.
The only thing I feel certain of is that the person who did it wanted to give Trump an excuse to fire RR. The list of people who would want that is pretty long. And does include the WH.
I wondered all day yesterday with Trump catching all the heat. Sessions can do that and say it was me and it’s pretty much over because the narrative is Trump doesn’t like sessions .
I don't think this is politically smart to make a move like this before the midterms.
Just my opinion.