“Take responsibility for your life” is an economic argument.
They’re all more likely to die in a car crash than to die during birth. Being alive is a risk for death.
No one is banning abortions when the woman is endangered and it represents less than 1% of abortions. Why do you keep arguing for things outside of the point?
Slow down. You're not focusing on what I am saying.
Taking responsibility for a life is not only economic. Far more encompassing than that.
I am not talking about abortions when a woman's life is endangered. My comment is regarding the forcing of a risk upon a woman that has the potential to kill her.
There simply is no debate that pregnancy alone forces a woman to accept risks to her health up to and including death. There is also no debate that pregnancy forces a woman to accept complete responsibility for the health and well being of the fetus. In your scenario I am killing you, but your existence does not pose a danger to my health like a fetus does to a woman nor I am burdened with the responsibility of your health and well being like you want to burden a woman with.
As for your car analogy. There is no law forcing me to drive, correct?