I still dont understand the logic behind giving complete control of the program to the same guy that was fired a decade earlier. Shouldve hired Blackburn, then brought Phil in as a special advisor. It doesnt make a whole lot of sense.
We hired a hotshot Admin once at work who was the next big thing. We felt we were in a rut. We let them make some decisions regarding some people and within 6 months we looked at the new hotshot and realized how big of a mistake we had made thinking that the current people were the problem. We took a real hard look at ourselves and ended up hiring some of the people back. We realized it wasn't the employees that were the problems but us as leaders who weren't focusing on the right things and placing blame instead of holding them to different and changing expectations. When you put the wrong people in charge of decision making, sometimes they make the wrong decisions. And when you realize it later, you have to fix it. You said "it didn't make any sense" If you look at it from the logic I gave, it does. I'm not saying Fulmer is the right or wrong guy, I'm just saying it isn't complete idiocy.