utgibbs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2009
- Messages
- 7,394
- Likes
- 0
Precisely. Oregon relies on a creative and unique offensive scheme much more than individual talent, as well as what was, under Belotti, a strong run of great defensive coaches. Here's a current comparison of the talent by HS recruiting rankings:
Tennessee
QB: #20
RB: #51; #9
WR: #2; #53; #4
TE: #55; #119
OT: #9; #112
OG/C: #124; #68; #141
DE: #38; #43
DT: #356; #74
LB: #167; #91; #52
CB: #40; #94; #17
S: #27; #46
Oregon
QB: #22
RB: #41; #3
WR: #21; #128; #117
TE: #25
OT: #48; #204
OG/C: #34; #241; #193
DE: #19; #172
DT: #63; #95
LB: #52; #70; #71
CB: #19; #205; #423
S: #39; #118
So comparing, from a recruit perspective:
QB: Even
RB: Oregon
WR/TE: Tennessee
OT: Tennessee
OG/C: Even
DE: Tennessee
DT: Oregon
LB: Oregon
CB: Tennessee
S: Tennessee
So, basically, talent, in terms of recruiting, is very even or slightly in favor of us, after accounting for all attrition, injuries, etc.
Where would your money be, VV, with no line?
I've circled this one on the calendar as one of our "Can Win" big games.