Jackcrevol
All Day Long!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2005
- Messages
- 75,967
- Likes
- 194,739
Do you mean the defense that allowed one TD drive longer than 26 yards?I tend to agree to an extent. Clock management sucked on the final drive. Offensive execution was lacking for a chunk of the game. I don’t even want to talk about the defense.
At the end of the day, though, what does it really matter in the grand scheme of things? Winning by less on the road in SEC play than what perhaps we should have is a whole lot better than the alternative, an alternative we’ve had a ton of experience with in the pre-Heupel days. I like to be thankful for what we have despite its imperfections.
Defense was hit or miss. To many missed tackles that really hurt the total look for the defense. Surprised we average 4.4 to there 3.5 I know sacks skewed the numbers but it's part of the whole. We get folks back it will get better. Players out and the refs made things a lot worse than the whole performance.Don’t need to. We had 11 TFLs and 5 sacks.
We have 20 sacks on the year.
One TD drive longer than 26 yards. One.Lots of debate on social media on whether Banks' defense won the game or could have lost the game in allowing MSU's offense move the ball and score.... with ease at times. How often can a team depend on a pick 6 or a scoop and score to win games? Or should a team rely on a solid defense that can stop drives and force punts?
One TD drive longer than 26 yards. One.
Yes. Rely on all of the defensive goodness.Lots of debate on social media on whether Banks' defense won the game or could have lost the game in allowing MSU's offense move the ball and score.... with ease at times. How often can a team depend on a pick 6 or a scoop and score to win games? Or should a team rely on a solid defense that can stop drives and force punts?
They ran a 3 man front with an OLB or CB at DE on one side and Carter at mike for much of the game. No way would anybody be able to stop a run game with that alignment against any SEC team. Sometimes he would even have the secondary in a soft zone when he did it.we didn't even have a run defense yesterday period... my wife kept asking, "why is TN just watching and letting the kid just get the ball and run right around the corner of the line or left around the corner of the line and no one goes after him... He gets like 5-8yds every time!?"
It was a very aggressive defensive calling, not in that we blitzed so often, but that we were playing pass rush almost all of the game. Have edges/de stunt routinely, giving up the edge and letting them run the football off guard/tackle with ease the whole first half. That was driving me insane.Lots of debate on social media on whether Banks' defense won the game or could have lost the game in allowing MSU's offense move the ball and score.... with ease at times. How often can a team depend on a pick 6 or a scoop and score to win games? Or should a team rely on a solid defense that can stop drives and force punts?
I made it and it was merged with the football talk thread. Not sure why.Where is the bye week thread? @OGbabyaviVol![]()
I think TN got the momentum at the beginning by stopping MSU on 3 and punt. I think that muffed punt return took the momentum away and changed the whole game allowing MSU a quick first score.Yes. Rely on all of the defensive goodness.
I'd prefer to also rely on not muffing punts. Catching long wide-open passes for TDs. Not throwing high over the middle for tipped interceptions. Not getting called for phantom OPIs that take TDs off the board.
If we stuff them on that opening drive, catch the punt, score. Stop them again. Score... The entire game gets a different perspective, as we start outpacing them and they can't just rely on that running game like they did. If our special teams and offense didn't start so terribly, it probably turns it into a blow-out.
You make points, but the facts are that the entire team was overconfident, hung over from UGA, lackadaisical, and just plain played terribly. There's plenty of praise and blame to go around on both sides. I'm just glad that, if we played an ugly game, we won an ugly game.
Snap, clear. Lessons to learn. Play better every week from here on out. All the goals are still on the table.
I don't like the consistency in not stopping 3rd and longs or 4th downs. Fast pace offence can wear a defense out and they need to get the defense on and off the field as fast as possible to give them a rest. Not stopping 3rd and long or 4th downs (or fake punts) keeps the D on the field longer tiring them out. MSU's success in the running game kept the defense on the field for long periods. Offense did make their fair share of mistakes in this game and made the game tougher for the defense.It was a very aggressive defensive calling, not in that we blitzed so often, but that we were playing pass rush almost all of the game. Have edges/de stunt routinely, giving up the edge and letting them run the football off guard/tackle with ease the whole first half. That was driving me insane.
I don't know about "hitting them in the mouth"..I feel lucky they won.