Recruiting forum off topic thread (merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.
stihl is good, but your 40 inch bar is going to get you in trouble. pulling that much chain you are going to bind, a little shorter also helps maintain wield-ability. you don't actually have to bisect the shark to kill it deader than Jaws. have you considered going with a 24 and dual wielding those sobs?

The only way I'd even consider dual wielding is if I had some in tree saws. They are best for when you're in the saddle 40 ft up and they're great because they can be operated with one arm.

As for the bar issue...The longer the bar, the better the chance you can maintain your kerf and thus reduce your chance of getting "bound" up. lol @ the thought of a chainsaw getting bound up on a shark. Ive actually used a 40 inch bar on a 660. Its rare that we use it. Mostly for huge pecans, oaks, some furs and even felled sequoias. I can say from experience a 660 cuts through hard wood like butter while a 440 is really powerful but it still makes you do some of the work. So if we're talking theoretical sharks falling from tornadoes, I think I can hold my own better with a 660 fairly well - but a 440 would probably be the ultimate chainsaw in terms of weight to power.
 
Husqvarna 346 XP E-Tech TrioBrake.

Reduced emissions...because earth. TrioBrake for safety, because I'll be on the run and such. Husqvarna because...what a cool name to yell while chain gutting airborne sharks.



Huskys are great. I used to have a 365. **** all dat safety emmision bullchit just makes the saw weaker. And lol wut is a Trio Brake? The older the saw , the stronger...excluding 80s models and such. 90s chainsaws are the truth. California's emission standards can go to he!!.
 
The only way I'd even consider dual wielding is if I had some in tree saws. They are best for when you're in the saddle 40 ft up and they're great because they can be operated with one arm.

As for the bar issue...The longer the bar, the better the chance you can maintain your kerf and thus reduce your chance of getting "bound" up. lol @ the thought of a chainsaw getting bound up on a shark. Ive actually used a 40 inch bar on a 660. Its rare that we use it. Mostly for huge pecans, oaks, some furs and even felled sequoias. I can say from experience a 660 cuts through hard wood like butter while a 440 is really powerful but it still makes you do some of the work. So if we're talking theoretical sharks falling from tornadoes, I think I can hold my own better with a 660 fairly well - but a 440 would probably be the ultimate chainsaw in terms of weight to power.

Okay, this is s serious topic and if you're just going to joke around then shame on you.
 
All of you pu***** killing sharks with your fancy pants chainsaws makes me laugh. The last time I was in a sharknadoe all I had was an old rusty pocket knife that my grandpa use to use to open cans of beenie weenies during the war. After the fifth shark the blade broke and I had to kill the last 20 or so with just the handle of the pocket knife and a piece of dental floss my wife had in her purse. #imsupercereal
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
All of you pu***** killing sharks with your fancy pants chainsaws makes me laugh. The last time I was in a sharknadoe all I had was an old rusty pocket knife that my grandpa use to use to open cans of beenie weenies during the war. After the fifth shark the blade broke and I had to kill the last 20 or so with just the handle of the pocket knife and a piece of dental floss my wife had in her purse. #imsupercereal

Kids these days just don't know how good they have it.

smdh
 
The only way I'd even consider dual wielding is if I had some in tree saws. They are best for when you're in the saddle 40 ft up and they're great because they can be operated with one arm.

As for the bar issue...The longer the bar, the better the chance you can maintain your kerf and thus reduce your chance of getting "bound" up. lol @ the thought of a chainsaw getting bound up on a shark. Ive actually used a 40 inch bar on a 660. Its rare that we use it. Mostly for huge pecans, oaks, some furs and even felled sequoias. I can say from experience a 660 cuts through hard wood like butter while a 440 is really powerful but it still makes you do some of the work. So if we're talking theoretical sharks falling from tornadoes, I think I can hold my own better with a 660 fairly well - but a 440 would probably be the ultimate chainsaw in terms of weight to power.

So...I'm going to go ahead and call dibs on Kirby's team when the sharks start falling.
 
Kirby's team would best be suited for a giant redwood attack... not flying sharks. JSTMOTIFWIW.
 
Kirby's team would best be suited for a giant redwood attack... not flying sharks. JSTMOTIFWIW.

Hey now, I'll still be running around freely with my chosen Husqvarna 346 XP E-Tech TrioBrake. But Kirby seems to have a lot more chainsaw knowledge than I do. So he can fix mine when it inevitably goes down from all the guts i'll be busting. :rock:
 
My cousin designs t-shirts that all have a local theme. This is his newest. Check out his site or like his Facebook page. Its called The DW Designs.
 

Attachments

  • dw.jpg
    dw.jpg
    58.7 KB · Views: 6
you've obviously never met a weed smoker. They're very defensive as a group when people tell them not to smoke/say they shouldn't be smoking.

that's not true how dare you say something bad about us it doesnt get in the way of my day to day life bro it will be completely legal in 20 years so it doesn't matter anyway

Edit: I typed this in all caps for comedic effect, but it came out in all lower case. Weird.
 
that's not true how dare you say something bad about us it doesnt get in the way of my day to day life bro it will be completely legal in 20 years so it doesn't matter anyway

Edit: I typed this in all caps for comedic effect, but it came out in all lower case. Weird.

Weed shrivels up letters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people
You've obviously never met a weed smoker. They're very defensive as a group when people tell them not to smoke/say they shouldn't be smoking.

Guess we now know JM's plan on how to gain weight quickly this summer :)

I kid...I kid..

Whatever the story is, hope it works out for everyone.
 
I guess my brain and typing abilities were inhibited because of all the marijuanas I smoked back in college. One time I smoked three whole marijuanas. Still not sure how I survived that night.

Whoa man. You're one wild son of a gun. Three whole marijuanas? It's a wonder you're still alive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
that's not true how dare you say something bad about us it doesnt get in the way of my day to day life bro it will be completely legal in 20 years so it doesn't matter anyway

Edit: I typed this in all caps for comedic effect, but it came out in all lower case. Weird.

Haha I still laughed. It uncaps me too most of the time
 
The first bit was just sarcasm. Your post made it seem unheard of that a weed smoker would stand up and argue that he should be allowed to smoke weed. Citizens or athletes, doesn't matter, most weed smokers are going to argue it.

Oh I get that. And yes, weed smokers and non weed smokers alike argue all the time over the issue. It is a conversation that has come to the forefront in recent years.

I was simply blown away by the notion of a scholarship athlete standing up in a team meeting and arguing with the head coach about smoking weed.

That is laugh out loud stupid. It doesn't get much dumber than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top