TheRain
🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
- Messages
- 8,474
- Likes
- 101,014
stihl is good, but your 40 inch bar is going to get you in trouble. pulling that much chain you are going to bind, a little shorter also helps maintain wield-ability. you don't actually have to bisect the shark to kill it deader than Jaws. have you considered going with a 24 and dual wielding those sobs?
Husqvarna 346 XP E-Tech TrioBrake.
Reduced emissions...because earth. TrioBrake for safety, because I'll be on the run and such. Husqvarna because...what a cool name to yell while chain gutting airborne sharks.
The only way I'd even consider dual wielding is if I had some in tree saws. They are best for when you're in the saddle 40 ft up and they're great because they can be operated with one arm.
As for the bar issue...The longer the bar, the better the chance you can maintain your kerf and thus reduce your chance of getting "bound" up. lol @ the thought of a chainsaw getting bound up on a shark. Ive actually used a 40 inch bar on a 660. Its rare that we use it. Mostly for huge pecans, oaks, some furs and even felled sequoias. I can say from experience a 660 cuts through hard wood like butter while a 440 is really powerful but it still makes you do some of the work. So if we're talking theoretical sharks falling from tornadoes, I think I can hold my own better with a 660 fairly well - but a 440 would probably be the ultimate chainsaw in terms of weight to power.
All of you pu***** killing sharks with your fancy pants chainsaws makes me laugh. The last time I was in a sharknadoe all I had was an old rusty pocket knife that my grandpa use to use to open cans of beenie weenies during the war. After the fifth shark the blade broke and I had to kill the last 20 or so with just the handle of the pocket knife and a piece of dental floss my wife had in her purse. #imsupercereal
The only way I'd even consider dual wielding is if I had some in tree saws. They are best for when you're in the saddle 40 ft up and they're great because they can be operated with one arm.
As for the bar issue...The longer the bar, the better the chance you can maintain your kerf and thus reduce your chance of getting "bound" up. lol @ the thought of a chainsaw getting bound up on a shark. Ive actually used a 40 inch bar on a 660. Its rare that we use it. Mostly for huge pecans, oaks, some furs and even felled sequoias. I can say from experience a 660 cuts through hard wood like butter while a 440 is really powerful but it still makes you do some of the work. So if we're talking theoretical sharks falling from tornadoes, I think I can hold my own better with a 660 fairly well - but a 440 would probably be the ultimate chainsaw in terms of weight to power.
Kirby's team would best be suited for a giant redwood attack... not flying sharks. JSTMOTIFWIW.
you've obviously never met a weed smoker. They're very defensive as a group when people tell them not to smoke/say they shouldn't be smoking.
that's not true how dare you say something bad about us it doesnt get in the way of my day to day life bro it will be completely legal in 20 years so it doesn't matter anyway
Edit: I typed this in all caps for comedic effect, but it came out in all lower case. Weird.
The first bit was just sarcasm. Your post made it seem unheard of that a weed smoker would stand up and argue that he should be allowed to smoke weed. Citizens or athletes, doesn't matter, most weed smokers are going to argue it.
