Recruiting forum off topic thread (merged)

[delfonic]

For those of you who haven't done so yet, you need to look up the gross Greg Maddux stories. Deadspin will run them from time to time. They are excellent reads.

 

[Smokey49]

Conredge Holloway story on ESPNU right now.

 

[PassedOutAwake]

That just doesn't sound great, to me ...

Chocolate covered cherry

 

[PassedOutAwake]

Conredge Holloway story on ESPNU right now.

Condredge Holloway's daughter = <3

 

[Playdo]

Chocolate covered cherry

 

[Catbone]

Bunch of pre maddonas up in here. Later rednecks

 

[Burger]

The only two guarantees in life are death and taxes.

 

[NashVOL93]

Condredge Holloway's daughter = <3

Oh man, I saw that. She's mighty easy on the eyes.

 

[Tennessee Golfer]

The only two guarantees in life are death and taxes.

Not if your an illegal.

 

[titansvolsfaninga]

Not if your an illegal.

Illegals don't die? Who knew. I thought immortals didn't die.

 

[Kurtastrophe]

Bunch of pre maddonas up in here. Later rednecks

Don't be an escape goat.

 

[pcvolfan]

Chocolate covered cherry

If you like that flavor profile, look for Harpoon Black Forest, Petrus Aged Red, Weyerbacher Tango, or Sam Adams Cherry Chocolate Bock. That way you do not need to mix beers.

 

[Burger]

Not if your an illegal.

Wait until the US Government declares bankruptcy to China. There won't be benefits for anyone after. I'd love a USA with no welfare, no food stamps. Only the elderly and disabled deserve those programs.

 

[Playdo]

Wait until the US Government declares bankruptcy to China. There won't be benefits for anyone after. I'd love a USA with no welfare, no food stamps. Only the elderly and disabled deserve those programs.

You sound like you'd be fun at a cocktail party.

 

[JRVFL]

Wait until the US Government declares bankruptcy to China. There won't be benefits for anyone after. I'd love a USA with no welfare, no food stamps. Only the elderly and disabled deserve those programs.

:crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy:

 

[eazyTD]

Wait until the US Government declares bankruptcy to China. There won't be benefits for anyone after. I'd love a USA with no welfare, no food stamps. Only the elderly and disabled deserve those programs.

 

[LebanonVolunteer]

Wait until the US Government declares bankruptcy to China. There won't be benefits for anyone after. I'd love a USA with no welfare, no food stamps. Only the elderly and disabled deserve those programs.

I agree on the welfare & food stamps thing. IMO those should only be provided for very short periods of time. Give a person/family 2-3 months to get back on their feet IF they need assistance and then you either do for yourself, or you don't. After 3 months, I'd cut off the assistance. IMO too many people now a days abuse the system.

 

[drvenner]

I agree on the welfare & food stamps thing. IMO those should only be provided for very short periods of time. Give a person/family 2-3 months to get back on their feet IF they need assistance and then you either do for yourself, or you don't. After 3 months, I'd cut off the assistance. IMO too many people now a days abuse the system.

Which is fine except for the fact that the infants, toddlers and other kids can't go to work.

 

[head1]

WTF does any of this have to do with Richmond?

 

[titansvolsfaninga]

WTF does any of this have to do with Richmond?

He's an illegal?

 

[eazyTD]

I agree on the welfare & food stamps thing. IMO those should only be provided for very short periods of time. Give a person/family 2-3 months to get back on their feet IF they need assistance and then you either do for yourself, or you don't. After 3 months, I'd cut off the assistance. IMO too many people now a days abuse the system.

So now you've moved on to number crunching the amount of welfare recipients?

I don't think you considered how many Americans were preferred walk ons for benefits and how many people Obama back counted from 2013. JMO

 

[LebanonVolunteer]

Which is fine except for the fact that the infants, toddlers and other kids can't go to work.

Non issue IMO. If a child's parents can't afford or choose not to go to work to take care of their kids needs, they don't need those kids.

Simple concept IMO. Do for your kids, or you won't have them.

JMO

 

[Burger]

Which is fine except for the fact that the infants, toddlers and other kids can't go to work.

They have things called parental units. Parents should be able to provide for their child without govt assistance. If they can't do that, they shouldn't have the kid.

 

[butchna]

Non issue IMO. If a child's parents can't afford or choose not to go to work to take care of their kids needs, they don't need those kids.

Simple concept IMO. Do for your kids, or you won't have them.

JMO

Probably shouldn't type out those opinions. :ermm:

 

[Playdo]

Non issue IMO. If a child's parents can't afford or choose not to go to work to take care of their kids needs, they don't need those kids.

Simple concept IMO. Do for your kids, or you won't have them.

JMO

How much more room do we have for welfare recipients this year, Leb?