Rodgers said he likes the ball to be inflated because of his strong grip pressure and large hand size but doesn't believe that's the norm.
"The majority of quarterbacks, I would say more than half, are maybe on the other end of the spectrum and like it on the flatter side," he said on his show. "My belief is that there should be a minimum air-pressure requirement but not a maximum. There's no advantage, in my opinion -- we're not kicking the football -- there's no advantage in having a pumped-up football.
"There is, if you don't have strong grip pressure or smaller hands, an advantage to having a flat football, though, because that is easier to throw. So I think that is something they need to look at. There should be a minimum on the air pressure but not a maximum. Every game they're taking air out of the footballs I'm throwing, and I think that's a disadvantage for the way that I like them prepped."
Here's the link to the entire article:
Aaron Rodgers of Green Bay Packers upset referees take air out of footballs - ESPN
Aaron Rodgers Likes To Tamper With Footballs, Too
This is the video that mentions that. Simms says that Rodgers overinflates the balls in the hopes that the refs don't let the extra air out.
Okay, maybe I'm not stating my case very well here. Let me try again.
I don't care about over- or under-inflated footballs. I don't. I think there's a very marginal advantage to be gained by skirting the rule in either direction. I have no quarrel with Aaron Rodgers, and my issue with the Patriots (aside from the sheer stupidity in trying to cheat against an already-overmatched opponent) is just the principle: they've been caught cheating again.
My original point was that suspending Belichick for a year is too much, and I brought up Rodgers to point out that people want the Patriots crushed because they hate the Patriots, not because what they did was so unforgivable. Does that make more sense?
This is a good article. And written by an ESPN Boston writer to boot.
If allegations prove true, New England Patriots' arrogance should have consequences - ESPN Boston
What course of action would you suggest?
Put the Colts in the Super Bowl? Or just award the Seahawks the championship without the SB? Both of those scenarios are laughable. Harsh punishment though should be dealt out since they have a history of unethical behavior, suspend Belichek from coaching for a season and take away a first round draft pick if they're serious about teams cheating.
Affecting the integrity of the game on the field twice still isn't as egregious as endangering the careers of targeted players though. At least in my opinion.
Like I said, if this all ends up pinned to Belichick then suspend him for the SB. Personally I think that sends a fitting message. But I think this 'suspend him for the year' stuff is rooted less in an interest in appropriate justice and more in a desire to hurt a hated franchise. Again, nobody is talking about Aaron Rodgers when he freely admits to trying to do the same thing.
Jackie MacMullan is a hell of a writer. I know you guys probably don't have any reason to read her stuff very often, but she's really good.
She's also right on the money.
lol, talking about never letting go of the past
Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones gives $10.65 million to Arkansas Razorbacks - ESPN Dallas
Right... so he openly admits to trying it. Just because he said it to Simms and not some ESPN reporter doesn't mean he isn't openly saying it. The point in bringing Rodgers's comments up is that there's a double standard, and I'm attempting to call attention to it. People hate the Patriots, so they want blood. People don't hate Rodgers, so it's shrugged off as an idiosyncrasy and a nonstory.
I'm not trying to deflect. VolGee was right - this is the second time the Patriots have been caught trying to cheat, and they do need to pay for it. My original point was simply that banning Belichick for a year is over the top, and this is where the discussion ended up.