Devo - you’ve misunderstood him. He’s not questioning the Vols ranking.My guess:
Texas won statistically. OSU was pretty much ***. At TEX or neutral field and TEX wins. That's what it's saying. And PSU wasn't playing anyone impressive enough to jump them. Of course, the original margin matters a lot too. TEX may have been way ahead in the model to begin with.
If I had to guess to your last question - a #8 team would have been expected to beat that Cuse team more handily. Having us #8 was very lofty to begin with. Of course... That and/or another team simply jumped us due to their own performance. But to your original point - how are we even #9 or begin at #8? No idea, but I'll take it lol. I'd guess last year's success, returning starters + recruiting.
Again, this is a statistical model. Process/decision-driven, not binary outcome-driven, as it should be.
My mind reading sucksDevo - you’ve misunderstood him. He’s not questioning the Vols ranking.
You have in your responses.
He isn’t.
His very valid concern is related to the rankings of other teams.
Yes!!I agree with all this, in merit. I dunno about the draft part.
I do know the opportunity here is, was, will be better than anything UCLA could offer. And he, and/or his camp, just made a poor choice in how to handle the situation.
And to be honest, early returns say that it may actually be a good thing for us in the long run.
Addition by subtraction. Unanswered prayers. Whatever you want to call it.
I do think this has more to do with his camp than it does him, so on some level I feel bad for the kid.
I think there's a lot to learn from this whole 23 QB class, in general.