AI summary
This is a four-page letter from a coalition of state attorneys general — from Tennessee, the District of Columbia, Florida, New York, and Ohio — addressed to congressional leaders. The letter expresses strong opposition to the SCORE Act (Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements Act), which relates to college sports and student-athlete compensation, especially around Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights.
Here’s a breakdown of what it means:

Main Argument
The attorneys general argue that:
The SCORE Act gives too much power to the NCAA, a private organization that has long operated as a monopoly in college sports.
If passed, the SCORE Act would override court rulings and state-level reforms that gave student-athletes more rights to be compensated for their NIL.
The Act would essentially protect the NCAA from lawsuits and regulation, reversing recent legal wins for student-athletes.
---

Specific Objections
1. Legal Immunity: The Act would give the NCAA protection from antitrust lawsuits, even when it behaves like a monopoly.
2. Federal Preemption: It would override state laws that are currently helping reform the system.
3. Codifies NCAA Control: It would give the NCAA unchecked authority over student-athlete compensation rules.
4. Undermines Court Decisions: It reverses progress made through cases like NCAA v. Alston where the courts sided with athletes.
5. Vague Standards: The new NIL commission set up by the NCAA uses unclear rules like “valid business purpose” to block compensation — and the SCORE Act would shield that from challenge.

Why It Matters
Student-athletes have fought for years to receive fair compensation.
Courts have repeatedly ruled that the NCAA's old rules violated antitrust laws.
This Act would allow the NCAA to keep acting with little oversight, going back to the same system that led to lawsuits in the first place.

Final Message
The attorneys general conclude by urging Congress not to pass the SCORE Act, calling it a “get-out-of-jail-free card” for the NCAA, and saying it undermines student rights, accountability, and court rulings.