tnvols72
Jesus is alive
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
- Messages
- 35,349
- Likes
- 66,914
Bruce had the elite 8 in his pocket. Barnes took over as the best when he matched it. Now he’s doubled it, he also has 3 conference championships under his belt. I love Bruce but it’s not a debate at all anymore. Barnes is the best to have ever done it here.
Bruce had the elite 8 in his pocket. Barnes took over as the best when he matched it. Now he’s doubled it, he also has 3 conference championships under his belt. I love Bruce but it’s not a debate at all anymore. Barnes is the best to have ever done it here.
Rick's is far more stacked, though he's been here longer. You can add the 1-and-dones too: Springer, Johnson, Phillips, Chandler.I’d be intrigued by a hypothetical all Bruce Pearl vs. Rick Barnes team. I appreciate what Pearl did, and I’m also appreciative of Rick’s tenure. I’m soaking every minute of this current run with Barnes.
Bruce’s team:
Chris Lofton (PG by committee
Jajaun Smith (PG by committee)
Tobias Harris
Tyler Smith
Wayne Chism
6th: JP Prince
Rick’s team:
Zakai Ziegler
Chaz Lanier
Dalton Knecht
Admiral Schofield
Grant Williams
6th: Lamonte Turner
These rosters are interchangeable either side. I would pick Rick’s team in this matchup.
Losses:lost to auburn, and another sec school.
i feel cautiously optimistic here. if we do our usual thing and play flat, we lose. if we play like we have been, we win.
Stokes was with Cunozo. Cuonzo’s hypothetical team would put up a fight too, surprisingly.Rick's is far more stacked, though he's been here longer. You can add the 1-and-dones too: Springer, Johnson, Phillips, Chandler.
Bruce has Jarnell Stokes.