PlanetVolunteer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2020
- Messages
- 12,523
- Likes
- 40,477
No, a sample size needs to be randomized across the entire population. Or you'd need to compare it to the same subset of other generations when they were 21-25 years old instead of comparing it to entire other generations. It's just bad study and sampling design all around.Statistics weren’t my strong suit but I’m pretty sure you can get an adequate sample size with 20% of a population.
Sounds to me like you’re letting “perfect” be the enemy of “good” as it relates to a stupid internet clickbait headline.No, a sample size needs to be randomized across the entire population. Or you'd need to compare it to the same subset of other generations when they were 21-25 years old instead of comparing it to entire other generations. It's just bad study and sampling design all around.
Gen Z is now 13-28.I call BS. No way to accurately tally that number with 80% of the generation being too young to buy it.