Recruiting Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,876
#1,876
BruinVol said:
Yes they have usually a student manager keep the stats and transfering them to the stat format is the issue I am told by JC coaches


As for your other question. I have no idea his minutes but I wouldn't bet the stats online are completely accurate. It's a Toss up
Click to expand...

So if you're saying a student manager keeps stats, which includes minutes played, and then school reporters write stories that evening with the stats given to them from those student managers, why would they be deemed unreliable? There is no format transfer that needs to be taken place, could even be just an exact copy of those stats kept by said manager.
 
#1,877
#1,877
bleedingTNorange said:
So if you're saying a student manager keeps stats, which includes minutes played, and then school reporters write stories that evening with the stats given to them from those student managers, why would they be deemed unreliable? There is no format transfer that needs to be taken place, could even be just an exact copy of those stats kept by said manager.
Click to expand...


Good grief not sure why this is even a discussion.

The coach I know said they changed the computer program the national site uses a few years ago. It's very hard to edit if any mistakes are made. It's why I brought it up when germ posted there is clearly a mistake with his kids
 
#1,880
#1,880
BruinVol said:
Good grief not sure why this is even a discussion.

The coach I know said they changed the computer program the national site uses a few years ago. It's very hard to edit if any mistakes are made. It's why I brought it up when germ posted there is clearly a mistake with his kids
Click to expand...

It's a discussion because you've made it one, you seemed to bring doubt to the accuracy of his mpg average, I said they jive with the articles written following games. Those stats would be directly from these student manages, so regardless of some lost is translation formula, the mpg average seems to be pretty accurate. Also add in he fact his coach has discussed his limited minutes played due to conditioning and it really seems like the reported numbers are pretty close to accurate.
 
#1,881
#1,881
germanicus said:
On delarosa, the mins calculation looks screwy. They have him down for one minute in games where he scored 15, 12 and 18. That's some serious offensive efficiency. 👍

NJCAA
Click to expand...

So in 3 games he scored well into double digits he only played 1 min?

If that's the case his average minutes per game on the national website can't be correct


Coaches in juco have complained about the stats program they are forced to use not being user friendly and hard to correct errors and I am sure that's happened here.

Any articles listing season averages of minutes played are most likely very flawed
 
#1,882
#1,882
BruinVol said:
So in 3 games he scored well into double digits he only played 1 min?

If that's the case his average minutes per game on the national website can't be correct


Coaches in juco have complained about the stats program they are forced to use not being user friendly and hard to correct errors and I am sure that's happened here.

Any articles listing season averages of minutes played are most likely very flawed
Click to expand...

This is where you seem to be struggling, I've not once mentioned articles with average minutes played, they give recaps of games with individual game stats, which includes minutes played for that game.

In all of those recaps I've found it seems De La Rosa's minutes range from 10-20 minutes played, with majority being around 15-18 range, so could the njcaa site be off by 1-2mpg, sure, I haven't said otherwise. However, it's also possible Kasongo was playing 2-3 more mpg than what we saw last year also, by this theory of yours, no?
 
#1,883
#1,883
I don't trust anything other that PTs on the JC national website for any player. I am sure some if not most schools get them correct but schools like this one mentioned here makes the entire site lose credibility
 
#1,885
#1,885
2017 Offer List:

#11 Ikechukwu Obiagu
#24 MJ Walker
#36 Devonte Shuler
#46 Alex Reese
#61 Lindell Wigginton
#65 Rayshaun Hammonds
#88 Victor Uyaelumno
#114 Andre Rafus
#123 Lavar Batts
#130 Tyler Polley
#131 Ibrahim Doumbia
#133 Nicholas Claxton
#134 Zach Kent
#137 David Sloan
#146 Wyatt Wilkes
#156 Isaiah Stokes
NR Victor Enoh


Vols offered Victor Enoh (teammate of Ikey Obiagu) sometime again, wasn't sure if he had an offer or not, but VQ confirmed it.

Recent post about Enoh:
Victor Enoh had record 23 rebs. Has Memphis, K.St., Tenn. offers. WF, UGA, Bama, UVA, VT, Xavier, LSU, FSU interest
Click to expand...

Vols seem to be targeting strongly: Obiagu, Walker, Wigginton, Hammonds and Uyaelumno early from what I've seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,886
#1,886
Chris Dortch
@cdortch
@Vol_Hoops fans if you're into stars, ESPN's latest rankings list Vol recruits Jalen Johnson, Grant Williams and Kwe Parker as 4 stars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,888
#1,888
bleedingTNorange said:
ESPN has Vols signees Jalen Johnson & Grant Williams ranked between 101-110 by my count, Kwe Parker is somewhere between 114-130.
Click to expand...

Good stuff.

Wierd most expected jumps from our recruits but very few expected Williams to get the biggest bump.

Surprised fulk didn't get mentioned
 
#1,891
#1,891
31VFL said:
Chris Dortch
@cdortch
@Vol_Hoops fans if you're into stars, ESPN's latest rankings list Vol recruits Jalen Johnson, Grant Williams and Kwe Parker as 4 stars.
Click to expand...

Three 4* players in a class? How is there not more talk about this? We haven't had that happen since when?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,893
#1,893
BruinVol said:
Does espn do team rankings?

Surely we are in decent shape with them since they like our players it seems
Click to expand...

Some of the rankings are behind a pay wall and I'm not sure if team rankings have been updated. I'm assuming these guys just got recent bumps to 4*.
 
#1,895
#1,895
BigZiti09 said:
Three 4* players in a class? How is there not more talk about this? We haven't had that happen since when?
Click to expand...

Most of the star gazers only come out to complain. Ha

Should also give a slight composite bump on 247, even if the other sites don't follow suit. Kinda surprised Bone wasn't bumped with them tho.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,897
#1,897
Lefteye said:
Most of the star gazers only come out to complain. Ha

Should also give a slight composite bump on 247, even if the other sites don't follow suit. Kinda surprised Bone wasn't bumped with them tho.
Click to expand...

For whatever reason, ESPN has almost nothing on Bone.
 
#1,900
#1,900
31VFL said:
For whatever reason, ESPN has almost nothing on Bone.
Click to expand...

I heard an interview with an espn guy the other day and the impression I got was they were really trying to take things serious now but it was a work in progress. I assumed that meant they were under staffed and seeing prospects was sporadic

Just the impression I got. He talked about all these 3 guys
 
New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top