Real Analysis vs. Opinions

#26
#26
The blue chip % matters very little nowadays. What was Vandy’s %? They committed to bringing in mid major upperclassmen who were starting elsewhere. We bring in young guys who redshirt and transfer out without doing anything except run scout team.

Need a coherent plan to manage this roster across several positions, including QB. We cannot go into next year with green QBs.
I am in agreement with you, bringing in mid major starters would be the path along with bringing in young guys that want to be at Tennessee until this nil crap gets settled. I think mid major college’s will become the training grounds and feel high school recruiting will become less important in the future. Spending less on recruiting to go into the nil funds.

The information below is what I found for 2025.

Vandy 2025 class included 13 high school recruit, 20 TRANSFERS ready to play. Class ranked 51.

old piss 2025 class included 23 HSR, 30 transfers ready to play. class ranked 16

ohio 2025 class included 26 HSR, 11 transfers ready to play. class ranked 4

VOLS 2025 class included 25 HSR of which over half had significant playing time, 7 transfers of which 4 started. class ranked 11
 
#27
#27
The blue chip % matters very little nowadays. What was Vandy’s %? They committed to bringing in mid major upperclassmen who were starting elsewhere. We bring in young guys who redshirt and transfer out without doing anything except run scout team.

Need a coherent plan to manage this roster across several positions, including QB. We cannot go into next year with green QBs.
Blue chips matter a lot, better coaches with better players win more than better coaches with worse players.
 
#29
#29
I really wish the "Pruitt, Jones, Dooley" stuff we constantly see on here would quit raising its ugly head every time there is a discussion after a loss - it's beyond irrelevant at this point, yet there is this irrational fear by so many in this fan base. The entire sports department has turned the corner because we have good, stable leadrership in White and Plowman who have made great decisions on their coaching hires, and money is being spent to keep it there.

I guess I'd be considered more of a "sunshine pumper" although the term is idiotic, because the negas I've come across here are complete fools who have no clue what goes into building a program and want to burn down the house whenever their asses are burned due to gambling losses, being trolled by friends or co-workers, or whatever.

The bottom line is that only an idiot believes that Heupel should be anywhere close to the hot seat, but last night was a clear wake-up call that some changes need to be made. Josh has made the point that great defense is the standard here, and it's time to back that talk up. I don't beleive that firing Martinez or any other position coach will solve the problem - if Josh wants a change defensively, and it would be hard to argue otherwise after what we've seen this year, then Banks has to go. Hire a DC and let him decide on position coaches he wants to keep of replace. Replacing position coaches is nothing but a band aid.

The issues with mobile QB's and getting off the field have been present as long as Banks has been here. Yesterday, the key going in defensively was to make Pavia a one-dimensional QB, and even Rodgers was saying on the broadcast that our DE's were not keeping contain and leaving gaping holes for Pavia to run. Pure lack of discipline. Last year the corners and DL depth masked the issues to an extent, but it isn't lack of talent that is the main issue here IMO.

Offensively, it's about expanding the palette, and Josh began that work last off season. Now it's more about game day adjustments and clock management, two bugaboos that have raised their heads throughout his tenure. We'll see how he'll address this, if at all, but his offense is CJH's stock in trade, and anyone expecting him to bring in a new OC with a new system is going to be badly disappointed.
 
#30
#30
Last three years of recruiting classes Tennessee ranked 11th, 14th, and 10th, Vandy 79, 40, 53. Either those recruiting rankings are BS or were getting severely outcoached by a lot of programs. What Vandy is doing looks amazing and it looks to me like we need a lot of changes starting next season with several position coaches. Main two DC and OC both need huge upgrades cause the current ones are not getting enough out of the talent we are supposedly recruiting.
Those rankings don’t take into account the transfers which is what Vandy has built their team with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThreatLevelOrange
#31
#31
I know some will question "real analysis", but this will be better than all the drunk armchair wannabe coaches that have never coached a day in their lives.
Josh Heupel has won 70% of his games at Tennessee (that is 75% when you through out his first year). This stat alone is amazing, especially when you realize the program he inherited. The only Tennessee coaches that had similar coaching records were General Neyland and Philip Fulmer (the only two coaches to win national titles at Tennessee). Even good ole Johnny Majors only had a 65% winning record. Oh, and the prior four coaches had between 45% and 55%, just in case some of you have forgotten.
This year's Tennessee team was the first team since Fulmer to have over 50% of the roster be blue-chip athletes (this is considered a must to win a national championship, since no team has won a national championship in the modern era with less than 51%). Heupel's next class will move this closer to 60%. For comparison, the top four programs (Georgia, Alabama, Ohio State, and Texas) have over 80%. So, other than a rare year, you really need closer to 80% to compete for a national title. Again, Heupel inherited 38% and has us closing in on 60%.
Doing a fair analysis of a coach isn't about one game, one loss, or one season; it is about his overall performance while head coaching. I think a fair analysis of Heupel's shortcomings would reveal lack of effective halftime adjustments (Heupel creates incredible pre-game game plans; however, other really good coaches make necessary adjustments and we lose in the second half sometimes due to this to the great teams). Additionally, it appears that time management, especially at the end of a half or the game has become an issue. However, both of these are manageable. Either Heupel can get some professional development in these areas or have an assistant coach who is good at them take these responsibilities.
While I honestly don't recognize Volnation anymore (which is why I come in here less and less), Tennessee is a good program who is close to making the leap into the upper echelon of teams again (those who three out of four years are in the playoffs). This list of teams is less than ten! So, while it has been a tough season, just think about what Heupel and company did it with. They took a former juco-App State QB and plugged him into the system with just fall practice to learn everything and now he is good enough to at least get a look as a free agent in the NFL. No other coach or team is coaching players up at this level.
So, whine all you want. Make all your negavol posts, but Heupel hopefully will be here for another ten years with AD Danny White. If so, it will give us our best chance at another special season ending with a National Championship!
Good analysis about the head coach. It doesn’t account for the assistants and their abilities. Something is lacking in the staff and that has to be addressed.
 
#32
#32
Wins against FBS teams with winning records (including bowls) by year:

2021- 2
2022- 5
2023- 4
2024- 3
2025- 0 (we might pick up one in the bowl game).

As you can see, it appears we are not trending in the right direction.
It was too heavy. We probably would get e couple of 7-5 teams along the way. But here it was 10-2 or losing record.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top