VOLnTtown
Not Pauly Shore
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2008
- Messages
- 31
- Likes
- 0
I'm sick of hearing about Steve Spurious' credentials. He hasn't shown me JACK in 4 years in Columbia, and I betcha that people like WestColumbiaGamecock are starting to wonder wth he hasn't competed for a SEC championship yet.
And Houston Nutt doesn't impress me either, honestly. I don't know what's up with all the Nutt love going on.
And until he coaches an SEC game, Petrino should be #12. He hasn't done jack at any organization where there was actually COMPETITION.
Bobby Johnson at 12 is a joke. If Vandy lets him stay at least until 8 years, I think you'll finally see some 8 win Vandy teams. My theory being that his first few recruiting classes are going to still have the stigma of the old Vandy teams...but the more they improve, the better players that will come in...and two years from now, Vandy will probably have a good enough roster to not just have a winning season, but have a decisive 8 win season.
.
Bobby Johnson at 12 is a joke. If Vandy lets him stay at least until 8 years, I think you'll finally see some 8 win Vandy teams. My theory being that his first few recruiting classes are going to still have the stigma of the old Vandy teams...but the more they improve, the better players that will come in...and two years from now, Vandy will probably have a good enough roster to not just have a winning season, but have a decisive 8 win season.
Sylvester Croom at 11 is also a joke. He completely turned that program around. He's done far more as an SEC coach than Bobby Petrino.
And Fulmer is ranked low because he has only coached at one school? So not being fired is a bad thing?
Any coach who loses to Louisiana-Monroe should be #11.
Any coach who has never coached a real team before should be #12.
I think there's some sort of law that states that every time coaches in the SEC get ranked, somebody has to chime in about Bobby Johnson really being a great coach, but that you just can't see it because he's at Vandy. Nevermind the fact that he is winning at the same rate as the last couple of guys who have had the job.
I think there's some sort of law that states that every time coaches in the SEC get ranked, somebody has to chime in about Bobby Johnson really being a great coach, but that you just can't see it because he's at Vandy. Nevermind the fact that he is winning at the same rate as the last couple of guys who have had the job.
What's delusional about saying that the guy with the most conference titles is the best coach? I don't agree with him, but it's not like he'd be a crazy choice as #1.