Randy Sanders > Jim Chaney???

#1

JMSqb11

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2011
Messages
18,867
Likes
19,257
#1
I wish we had Sanders as our OC over Chaney. I mean he was horrible his last few years but with talent we have, I would love to see his performance. There is no reason with our size on O-line that he could not do significantly better. I think if he had an offense worth a dam, he would do better.

Anyway, that is just a thought. I support Chaney and Dooley and the Vols football team.

GBO!!!!!

Vols 63
Akron 3
 
#4
#4
I definitely think our running game would be a lot better. I mean people say Fulmer lost his competitiveness and got complacent. I think the same happened with Sanders. Why he hasn't left Kentucky, I do not know. I think this is his last season with them though.
 
#5
#5
dog_wtf.gif
 
#7
#7
Sanders is not an upgrade to Chaney. Both have similar playbooks that are fairly predictable.
 
#9
#9
Just asking...

Back in the day Randy Sanders took a LOT of heat. But hindsight being what it is... is he a better OC than Jim Chaney? About the same?

Thanks!

Jim
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#19
#19
Seriously guys. Kentucky has punted every drive. Come on. Sanders was garbage and we just have to deal with what we got. In my opinion Chaney is gone after this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#23
#23
They just said Kentucky hasn't scored a TD in the 1st qtr since 2010. Just made this thread even dumber!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#25
#25
What did my original post say? With our talent he would actually have a better performance than at Kentucky. He has never had any talent worth a dam there.
 

VN Store



Back
Top